The government will initiate measures to address various issues gripping the property sector, including curbing rampant speculative activities in the market.
Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Seri Chor Chee Heung said he would present to the cabinet findings of an industry meeting which could be used to come up with innovative ways to build affordable homes.
"The government has done fairly well in addressing the housing issues of the lower income. However, 40 per cent of the medium-income society still need accommodation.
"My ministry will use some of the findings to improve the sector," Chor told reporters here after opening a roundtable discussion on "Housing Affordability - Issues and Challenges".
The government will put forward recommendations, which will be based on proposals made by Real Estate and Housing Developers Association Malaysia (Rehda) such as on how to curb speculative property prices, financing, abandoned projects and sluggish developments.
Metro Kajang Holdings Bhd group managing director Datuk Eddy Chen Lok Loi said for example, a house built in Perlis cost RM250,000 but the same house using the very same materials but built in KLCC would cost RM1 million.
"This is caused by land cost due to two different locations. Nevertheless, there are some of the issues which Rehda will look into to address this such as materials prices. Working groups and a task force have been set up," said Chen.
Meanwhile, National House Buyers Association secretary general Chang Kim Loong said all parties, including the government and developers, need to launch proactive measures to stop steep price increases in the property market due to false demand and excessive speculation fuelled by easy mortgages and low real property gain tax.
"There is a huge mismatch between what the average household income can afford to buy compared to what is available in the market. A homeless generation will emerge and create various social problems," said Chang.
Chang said the average rakyat in a major urban area was struggling to buy his dream home where the average household with income of RM5,962 in 2009 would not be able to qualify for a 90 per cent loan over a 30-year period.
Assuming the average household income rises 15 per cent this year, the household may still not qualify for a 90 per cent loan in far areas such as Kajang, let alone in hot areas such as Kuala Lumpur.
He added that the government must also fine-tune the Bumiputera quota which has not made any headways.
"Don't get me wrong, we have no qualms over the discount for the first buy. But when you buy properties for the fourth and the fifth time and get up to 15 per cent discount ... that is wrong," said Chang.
By Business Times
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Making way for affordable homes
REHDA’S CALL: Government should free up some land for construction of affordable homes to ease pent-up demand
The government must free some of its land to make way for affordable homes to address the current pent-up demand situation.
Real Estate and Housing Developers Association Malaysia (Rehda) president Datuk Seri Michael Yam Kong Choy said it must act now before the situation becomes critical.
"As of now, Malaysia needs 180,000 homes a year but the industry can only supply 100,000 units. One of the many ways to counter this problem is to identify federal or state lands which can be converted into affordable housing schemes," Yam told reporters at Rehda's headquarters here yesterday.
Yam was presenting a paper at the roundtable discussion on "Housing Affordability - Issues and Challenges", launched by Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Seri Chor Chee Heung.
The land includes sites of government quarters, public golf courses or land after the relocation of residential schools and zoos.
"We need to shift development focus of government-owned land to affordable housing, instead of commercial projects such as the Rubber Research Institute land in Sungai Buloh, Pudu jail and the Sungai Besi airport.
For immediate action plan, focus must be given to build affordable homes, from low cost with prices ranging between RM150,000 and RM350,000.
"There should be no more low cost quota. Government must provide social housing or transit housing for the hardcore and urban poor."
Yam said for planning control, the industry should be allowed higher plot ratio to enable the development of smaller units.
Developers should be given incentives for projects in public transport and transit areas with higher density/plot ratio.
To address issues of increasing cost, the sector must be free of new compliance costs, more certainty in Bumiputera quota release system, faster approvals and freeze imposition of policies or guideline laws that add to the cost of development.
Financing must be cheaper for the first time buyer and more tiered payments where homebuyers can pay less now and gradually pay more later (to be reviewed every five years).
For loan applications, housebuyers must be given more flexible criteria and not merely focus on net income.
Yam said the government should assist buyers with acquisition costs such as lower stamp duty for affordable homes.
As an example, a stamp duty of 0.5 per cent for the first transaction rate of RM300,000 compared with one per cent at the moment for the first RM100,000.
Another action plan is to make connectivity to urban areas more accessible, improve public transportation system and reasonable travelling distance to place of work.
For the medium to long term plan, the government should refurbish existing buildings such as public low cost houses, council homes and government complexes to affordable homes.
The Malay reserve land or new villages can also be new potential sites for affordable housing as well as building over existing transport infrastructure such as high rise apartments over LRT (light rail transit) stations or over KTM Komuter routes.
By Business Times
The government must free some of its land to make way for affordable homes to address the current pent-up demand situation.
Real Estate and Housing Developers Association Malaysia (Rehda) president Datuk Seri Michael Yam Kong Choy said it must act now before the situation becomes critical.
"As of now, Malaysia needs 180,000 homes a year but the industry can only supply 100,000 units. One of the many ways to counter this problem is to identify federal or state lands which can be converted into affordable housing schemes," Yam told reporters at Rehda's headquarters here yesterday.
Yam was presenting a paper at the roundtable discussion on "Housing Affordability - Issues and Challenges", launched by Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Seri Chor Chee Heung.
The land includes sites of government quarters, public golf courses or land after the relocation of residential schools and zoos.
"We need to shift development focus of government-owned land to affordable housing, instead of commercial projects such as the Rubber Research Institute land in Sungai Buloh, Pudu jail and the Sungai Besi airport.
For immediate action plan, focus must be given to build affordable homes, from low cost with prices ranging between RM150,000 and RM350,000.
"There should be no more low cost quota. Government must provide social housing or transit housing for the hardcore and urban poor."
Yam said for planning control, the industry should be allowed higher plot ratio to enable the development of smaller units.
Developers should be given incentives for projects in public transport and transit areas with higher density/plot ratio.
To address issues of increasing cost, the sector must be free of new compliance costs, more certainty in Bumiputera quota release system, faster approvals and freeze imposition of policies or guideline laws that add to the cost of development.
Financing must be cheaper for the first time buyer and more tiered payments where homebuyers can pay less now and gradually pay more later (to be reviewed every five years).
For loan applications, housebuyers must be given more flexible criteria and not merely focus on net income.
Yam said the government should assist buyers with acquisition costs such as lower stamp duty for affordable homes.
As an example, a stamp duty of 0.5 per cent for the first transaction rate of RM300,000 compared with one per cent at the moment for the first RM100,000.
Another action plan is to make connectivity to urban areas more accessible, improve public transportation system and reasonable travelling distance to place of work.
For the medium to long term plan, the government should refurbish existing buildings such as public low cost houses, council homes and government complexes to affordable homes.
The Malay reserve land or new villages can also be new potential sites for affordable housing as well as building over existing transport infrastructure such as high rise apartments over LRT (light rail transit) stations or over KTM Komuter routes.
By Business Times
Labels:
Property Market
Govt aims for affordable housing for middle-income group
PETALING JAYA: Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Seri Chor Chee Heung said the housing needs of the middle-income group, which formed more than 40% of the community, must be addressed and hoped that the 1Malaysia People's Housing Scheme (Prima) announced last year would progress speedily.
Low cost housing is capped at RM42,000, while affordable housing cost between RM85,000 and RM300,000.
Chor said the Government had been successful in providing low cost housing, but there was a need to look into the grouses of the middle-income group.
Chor said this to reporters after attending a roundtable discussion entitled “Housing Affordability: Issues and Challenges”, jointly organised by the Real Estate Housing Developers Association (Rehda) and the Eastern Regional Organisation for Planning and Human Settlement yesterday.
“The Ministry will consider the views and suggestions by the task force to be formed and we will put forward views and perspectives to the Federal Government.
“Affordable housing has become an important topic, with the greatest need being in urban centres like Kuala Lumpur and Penang and to a certain degree in Johor Baru due to urban migration.
“The Prima scheme is a laudable project...(but) it is moving sluggishly. We hope to see Prima making speedy progress. At the same time, we also hope the developers will play their role,” he said.
He said it might be more efficient to streamline the different agencies which provided housing. Chor said it was not possible to compare Malaysia's housing situation with Singapore because the government there was able to step in quickly to provide both low and middle-cost housing units.
Earlier, at the discussion, Rehda president Datuk Michael Yam listed out the challenges faced by developers when providing social housing including the high cost of land. “Planning requirements need to be reviewed because we are beginning to see a proliferation of small serviced apartments into the market. Developers are resorting to building small units in order to increase the number of units to make the project viable,” Yam said.
He called on the Government to free government and state land for affordable housing and to exempt developers from having to fork out capital for utilities infrastructure like reservoir and sub-stations.
“In developed countries, the government build all these and the developers pay a contribution. When developers have to fork out capital expenditure for the infrastructure, invariably the consumer will have to pay for it. This results in an increase in housing cost,” said Yam.
Secretary-general of the House Buyers Association Chang Kim Loong called on the Government to bring back the real property gains tax in full force to curb speculation.
Effective since Jan 1, this year, the gains from property held for less than two years were subjected to a 10% tax. For properties held between two and five years, a 2% was imposed while those who kept it for more than five years are exempted from tax.
Under the previous ruling, a Malaysian individual who sells his property within the first two years of purchase is taxed 30% of the gains. The rates slide to 20% (third year), 15% (fourth year) and 5% (fifth year). He is not taxed on the sixth and subsequent year.
By The Star
Low cost housing is capped at RM42,000, while affordable housing cost between RM85,000 and RM300,000.
Chor said the Government had been successful in providing low cost housing, but there was a need to look into the grouses of the middle-income group.
Chor said this to reporters after attending a roundtable discussion entitled “Housing Affordability: Issues and Challenges”, jointly organised by the Real Estate Housing Developers Association (Rehda) and the Eastern Regional Organisation for Planning and Human Settlement yesterday.
“The Ministry will consider the views and suggestions by the task force to be formed and we will put forward views and perspectives to the Federal Government.
“Affordable housing has become an important topic, with the greatest need being in urban centres like Kuala Lumpur and Penang and to a certain degree in Johor Baru due to urban migration.
“The Prima scheme is a laudable project...(but) it is moving sluggishly. We hope to see Prima making speedy progress. At the same time, we also hope the developers will play their role,” he said.
He said it might be more efficient to streamline the different agencies which provided housing. Chor said it was not possible to compare Malaysia's housing situation with Singapore because the government there was able to step in quickly to provide both low and middle-cost housing units.
Earlier, at the discussion, Rehda president Datuk Michael Yam listed out the challenges faced by developers when providing social housing including the high cost of land. “Planning requirements need to be reviewed because we are beginning to see a proliferation of small serviced apartments into the market. Developers are resorting to building small units in order to increase the number of units to make the project viable,” Yam said.
He called on the Government to free government and state land for affordable housing and to exempt developers from having to fork out capital for utilities infrastructure like reservoir and sub-stations.
“In developed countries, the government build all these and the developers pay a contribution. When developers have to fork out capital expenditure for the infrastructure, invariably the consumer will have to pay for it. This results in an increase in housing cost,” said Yam.
Secretary-general of the House Buyers Association Chang Kim Loong called on the Government to bring back the real property gains tax in full force to curb speculation.
Effective since Jan 1, this year, the gains from property held for less than two years were subjected to a 10% tax. For properties held between two and five years, a 2% was imposed while those who kept it for more than five years are exempted from tax.
Under the previous ruling, a Malaysian individual who sells his property within the first two years of purchase is taxed 30% of the gains. The rates slide to 20% (third year), 15% (fourth year) and 5% (fifth year). He is not taxed on the sixth and subsequent year.
By The Star
Labels:
Property Market
Plans for 'no frills' homes
KELANA JAYA: Malaysia is mulling to build its first affordable "no frills" houses so that the rakyat can own homes of their own.
Mooted by the Real Estate and Housing Developers Association Malaysia and the Housing and Local Government Ministry, the house will be 30 per cent cheaper and will be custom-finished by the owner.
Immediate past president Datuk Ng Seing Liong said the house will be "naked" but equipped with basic amenities such as the kitchen and the toilet but there will be no partitions to segregate the rooms.
"This is to allow owners to choose to have two or three rooms, depending on the owner's marital status or the number of children," Ng told reporters here yesterday at a roundtable on "Housing Affordability - Issues and Challenges".
Ng said the no frills house will be 30 per cent cheaper than the current affordable home price tag of between RM80,000 and RM350,000.
Ng said the concept is not new and has been introduced in China and the Philippines. He said all parties are discussing on it at the moment.
Minister of Housing and Local Government Datuk Seri Chor Chee Heung said the no frills home is one of the sectors innovative ways to build affordable homes.
Housing is a very serious problem worldwide, especially for the middle class. Even ministers in China find it difficult to buy homes despite it being a socialist country.
By Business Times
Mooted by the Real Estate and Housing Developers Association Malaysia and the Housing and Local Government Ministry, the house will be 30 per cent cheaper and will be custom-finished by the owner.
Immediate past president Datuk Ng Seing Liong said the house will be "naked" but equipped with basic amenities such as the kitchen and the toilet but there will be no partitions to segregate the rooms.
"This is to allow owners to choose to have two or three rooms, depending on the owner's marital status or the number of children," Ng told reporters here yesterday at a roundtable on "Housing Affordability - Issues and Challenges".
Ng said the no frills house will be 30 per cent cheaper than the current affordable home price tag of between RM80,000 and RM350,000.
Ng said the concept is not new and has been introduced in China and the Philippines. He said all parties are discussing on it at the moment.
Minister of Housing and Local Government Datuk Seri Chor Chee Heung said the no frills home is one of the sectors innovative ways to build affordable homes.
Housing is a very serious problem worldwide, especially for the middle class. Even ministers in China find it difficult to buy homes despite it being a socialist country.
By Business Times
Labels:
Property Market
Sp Setia's Liew, PNB likely to stay out of share placement
PETALING JAYA: SP Setia Bhd president/chief executive officer Tan Sri Liew Kee Sin and Permodalan Nasional Bhd (PNB) are unlikely to be taking up shares in the proposed share placement exercise which the property developer announced on Monday.
An analyst told StarBiz that the proposal would be pointless if PNB and Liew were among those identified to take up the shares since among the stated objectives of the share placement was to increase liquidity of the stock.
“They've to do it because the stock's not liquid and the announcement has been expected for some time,” she said. PNB currently has a 51.63% stake while through Skim Amanah Saham Bumiputera, it has another 18.41% stake. Liew has a 5.65% stake, the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) has a 5.28% while Kumpulan Wang Persaraan has a 5.10% stake.
The share placement exercise comes on the heels of announcements by SP Setia of several multi-billion ringgit joint-venture projects, of which the most prominent would be the Battersea project in London announced early last month and the Qinzhou Industrial Park in south-west China announced in April.
Besides the proposed share placement, SP Setia has also proposed a new employees' share option scheme (Esos) of up to 15% of the issued and paid-up share capital of the company while proposing the cancellation of the existing Esos.
SP Setia and PNB were not able to reply to further queries on the proposed share placement exercise at press time.
Meanwhile, a Sime Darby Bhd official said the company had no plans to do a cash call at the moment. “Balance sheet-wise, we're in good shape,” she said. Sime Darby has a 40% stake in the joint venture to develop the Battersea project, the EPF holds a 20% stake while SP Setia owns the remainder stake.
To recap, Maybank Investment Bank Bhd said in an announcement to the stock exchange that SP Setia was proposing a new issuance of up to 15% of the issued and paid-up share capital of the company or up to 322.69 million shares.
The exercise would raise a minimum RM957.4mil assuming the price of the placement shares was fixed at RM3.19 per share based on a 10% discount to the five-day volume weighted average market price and a minimum take-up rate of 300.11 million shares.
The proceeds would be utilised to part-finance the cost of land acquisitions and initial project development expenditure, to meet the general working capital requirements as well as to defray the expenses relating to the proposals.
CIMB Investment Bank Bhd said in a note that the impact of the placement would be slightly negative on valuations.
“We estimate the private placement will dilute revised net asset value (RNAV) by 3% to RM4.17 (per share) and financial year ending Oct 31, 2013 (FY13) to FY15 earnings per share (EPS) by 6% to 12%,” it said, adding that the Esos would be an important means of retaining and incentivising staff.
Affin Investment Bank Bhd analyst Isaac Chow said in a report that the proposal, while positive in the long-term, would dampen investors' sentiment of the company in the short term.
He said assuming all the shares were placed out at RM3.23, the placement would dilute its EPS for FY13 to FY14 by 7% to 8%.
Chow recommends that investors acquire the shares via the placement exercise rather than in the open market. He has put the “reduce” rating and target price (of RM3.60) based on 15% discount to RNAV under review.
SP Setia's share price closed two sen lower at RM3.49 yesterday.
By The Star
An analyst told StarBiz that the proposal would be pointless if PNB and Liew were among those identified to take up the shares since among the stated objectives of the share placement was to increase liquidity of the stock.
“They've to do it because the stock's not liquid and the announcement has been expected for some time,” she said. PNB currently has a 51.63% stake while through Skim Amanah Saham Bumiputera, it has another 18.41% stake. Liew has a 5.65% stake, the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) has a 5.28% while Kumpulan Wang Persaraan has a 5.10% stake.
The share placement exercise comes on the heels of announcements by SP Setia of several multi-billion ringgit joint-venture projects, of which the most prominent would be the Battersea project in London announced early last month and the Qinzhou Industrial Park in south-west China announced in April.
Besides the proposed share placement, SP Setia has also proposed a new employees' share option scheme (Esos) of up to 15% of the issued and paid-up share capital of the company while proposing the cancellation of the existing Esos.
SP Setia and PNB were not able to reply to further queries on the proposed share placement exercise at press time.
Meanwhile, a Sime Darby Bhd official said the company had no plans to do a cash call at the moment. “Balance sheet-wise, we're in good shape,” she said. Sime Darby has a 40% stake in the joint venture to develop the Battersea project, the EPF holds a 20% stake while SP Setia owns the remainder stake.
To recap, Maybank Investment Bank Bhd said in an announcement to the stock exchange that SP Setia was proposing a new issuance of up to 15% of the issued and paid-up share capital of the company or up to 322.69 million shares.
The exercise would raise a minimum RM957.4mil assuming the price of the placement shares was fixed at RM3.19 per share based on a 10% discount to the five-day volume weighted average market price and a minimum take-up rate of 300.11 million shares.
The proceeds would be utilised to part-finance the cost of land acquisitions and initial project development expenditure, to meet the general working capital requirements as well as to defray the expenses relating to the proposals.
CIMB Investment Bank Bhd said in a note that the impact of the placement would be slightly negative on valuations.
“We estimate the private placement will dilute revised net asset value (RNAV) by 3% to RM4.17 (per share) and financial year ending Oct 31, 2013 (FY13) to FY15 earnings per share (EPS) by 6% to 12%,” it said, adding that the Esos would be an important means of retaining and incentivising staff.
Affin Investment Bank Bhd analyst Isaac Chow said in a report that the proposal, while positive in the long-term, would dampen investors' sentiment of the company in the short term.
He said assuming all the shares were placed out at RM3.23, the placement would dilute its EPS for FY13 to FY14 by 7% to 8%.
Chow recommends that investors acquire the shares via the placement exercise rather than in the open market. He has put the “reduce” rating and target price (of RM3.60) based on 15% discount to RNAV under review.
SP Setia's share price closed two sen lower at RM3.49 yesterday.
By The Star
Labels:
Property Market
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Encorp to expand landbank
PROPERTY developer Encorp Bhd, which currently has a total landbank of 107.36ha, is looking for more land in Malaysia and in the region.
Executive chairman Datuk Seri Mohd Effendi Norwawi said the company is currently in advance negotiation to buy several pieces of land in Peninsular Malaysia while scouting for opportunities in Australia and the Asean region.
"Our business development team is very busy reviewing various locations with potential for development in both local and overseas to expand our current land banks," he said.
Encorp's property projects have a combined gross development value of RM3.4 billion.
Effendi said with Encorp's achievements to date, the group is expected to generate a profit of about RM680 million over a period of five years.
"However, we are in the process of looking at other prospective ventures that will enhance revenue, profit and sustainability in the coming years," he said.
For this year, Encorp will be developing the integrated resort and international golf course in Cherating, the launch of Encorp Marina at Puteri Harbour in Johor and Encorp Ferringhi in Penang.
"More future projects are in the pipeline in both Klang Valley and our resort home development in Cherating," he said in a recent e-mail interview.
On the recent acquisition of land in Perth, Australia, Effendi said it will keep the group busy for the next five to eight years.
Encorp recently bought a 11,000 sq m property in Perth for about RM18.54 million to be developed into a mixed residential and commercial project.
The project will have a gross development value of A$13 million (RM42.77 million) with construction expected to begin in the second quarter of 2014 and completed by 2017.
"Our maiden project in Perth has enjoyed good take-up rate and with this, we are looking for more opportunities in Australia. We are also exploring opportunities in other Asean countries," said Effendi.
Its maiden project in Perth is named the Residences on McCallum Lane and was launched to investors in October last year.
It is located in a prime location, close to Perth's central business district and is a 10-minute drive away from Curtin University, and 10 to 15 minutes away from University of Western Australia.
Back home, Encorp's major land- bank include the 18.24ha for its Encorp Strand project, 84ha of its Cahaya Alam project, 1.32ha in Johor for the Puteri Harbour project and 2.32ha of land in Batu Feringghi, Penang.
By Business Times
Executive chairman Datuk Seri Mohd Effendi Norwawi said the company is currently in advance negotiation to buy several pieces of land in Peninsular Malaysia while scouting for opportunities in Australia and the Asean region.
"Our business development team is very busy reviewing various locations with potential for development in both local and overseas to expand our current land banks," he said.
Encorp's property projects have a combined gross development value of RM3.4 billion.
Effendi said with Encorp's achievements to date, the group is expected to generate a profit of about RM680 million over a period of five years.
"However, we are in the process of looking at other prospective ventures that will enhance revenue, profit and sustainability in the coming years," he said.
For this year, Encorp will be developing the integrated resort and international golf course in Cherating, the launch of Encorp Marina at Puteri Harbour in Johor and Encorp Ferringhi in Penang.
"More future projects are in the pipeline in both Klang Valley and our resort home development in Cherating," he said in a recent e-mail interview.
On the recent acquisition of land in Perth, Australia, Effendi said it will keep the group busy for the next five to eight years.
Encorp recently bought a 11,000 sq m property in Perth for about RM18.54 million to be developed into a mixed residential and commercial project.
The project will have a gross development value of A$13 million (RM42.77 million) with construction expected to begin in the second quarter of 2014 and completed by 2017.
"Our maiden project in Perth has enjoyed good take-up rate and with this, we are looking for more opportunities in Australia. We are also exploring opportunities in other Asean countries," said Effendi.
Its maiden project in Perth is named the Residences on McCallum Lane and was launched to investors in October last year.
It is located in a prime location, close to Perth's central business district and is a 10-minute drive away from Curtin University, and 10 to 15 minutes away from University of Western Australia.
Back home, Encorp's major land- bank include the 18.24ha for its Encorp Strand project, 84ha of its Cahaya Alam project, 1.32ha in Johor for the Puteri Harbour project and 2.32ha of land in Batu Feringghi, Penang.
By Business Times
Labels:
Land,
Property Market
KLCC Property posts net profit of RM91.6mil
KUALA LUMPUR: KLCC Property Holdings Bhd posted a net profit of RM91.6mil, or 9.81 sen per share for the second quarter ended June 30. Its revenue stood at RM288.6mil during the quarter.
For the six months ended June 30, KLCC Property posted a net profit of RM193.1mil on revenue of RM564.4mil.
On March 2, KLCC Property announced the change of financial year-end from March 31 to Dec 31 beginning from April 2011. As a result, there is no equivalent comparative quarter.
KLCC Property’s pre-tax profit of RM184.4mil achieved in the second quarter was up by RM2.5mil or 1.4% higher than the preceding quarter mainly due to improved operating profit. Its revenue of RM288.6mil for the second quarter increased by RM12.8mil when compared with the preceding quarter attributable mainly to the higher revenue from hotel, the Menara 3 Petronas office and improved revenue from retail segment (Suria KLCC and Menara 3 Petronas).
“The directors are of the view that the results for the remaining 2012 period will remain stable due to long-term office tenancies and expected improvement in retail occupancy. The hotel segment will continue to trade in a competitive environment,” it said in the notes accompanying its financial results.
By The Star
For the six months ended June 30, KLCC Property posted a net profit of RM193.1mil on revenue of RM564.4mil.
On March 2, KLCC Property announced the change of financial year-end from March 31 to Dec 31 beginning from April 2011. As a result, there is no equivalent comparative quarter.
KLCC Property’s pre-tax profit of RM184.4mil achieved in the second quarter was up by RM2.5mil or 1.4% higher than the preceding quarter mainly due to improved operating profit. Its revenue of RM288.6mil for the second quarter increased by RM12.8mil when compared with the preceding quarter attributable mainly to the higher revenue from hotel, the Menara 3 Petronas office and improved revenue from retail segment (Suria KLCC and Menara 3 Petronas).
“The directors are of the view that the results for the remaining 2012 period will remain stable due to long-term office tenancies and expected improvement in retail occupancy. The hotel segment will continue to trade in a competitive environment,” it said in the notes accompanying its financial results.
By The Star
E&O loses more than RM400m in market value
The shares of Eastern & Oriental dived after the Securities Commission said it's investigating trading related to the stock.
EASTERN & Oriental Bhd (E&O) lost more than RM400 million of its market capitalisation as nervous investors sold shares of the property developer after the Securities Commission (SC) said it's investigating trading related to the stock.
From the word go, E&O shares were in negative territory, opening the trading session some 33 sen lower at RM1.57 sen a share. It ended yesterday at RM1.54 with 24.8 million shares exchanging hands.
CIMB, in a research report yesterday, had advised investors to wait for the shares to drop to the RM1.50 level before they start accumulating the shares again.
Dealers said that the report helped stymie panic-selling in E&O's mother share, but it did not translate to the E&O call warrants, which had a free-for-all selldown.
The E&O call warrants, which expire at the end of this month, opened the trading day some 81 per cent lower at three sen. It ended the day at 3.5 sen per call warrant with some 30 million call warrants traded.
Just last Friday, E&O was among the most sought-after stock on the exchange, with investors chasing the shares up to the maximum limit-up level, following a Web-based news portal's report that the SC will order Sime Darby Bhd to make a general offer for the E&O shares which they do not own.
A year ago, Sime Darby had bought some 30 per cent of E&O, a niche based high-end property developer from Penang.
The report said that the decision was made after a review by the commission's leadership under its new chairman Datuk Ranjit Ajit Singh.
However, the same evening, the SC released a statement saying that its position on the general offer requirement remained unchanged as per its statement issued October last year, which said that Sime Darby does not have to make a general offer for the remaining shares in E&O.
The regulator also added that it has started examining the trading activities associated with the relevant counters arising from the rumours.
By Business Times
EASTERN & Oriental Bhd (E&O) lost more than RM400 million of its market capitalisation as nervous investors sold shares of the property developer after the Securities Commission (SC) said it's investigating trading related to the stock.
From the word go, E&O shares were in negative territory, opening the trading session some 33 sen lower at RM1.57 sen a share. It ended yesterday at RM1.54 with 24.8 million shares exchanging hands.
CIMB, in a research report yesterday, had advised investors to wait for the shares to drop to the RM1.50 level before they start accumulating the shares again.
Dealers said that the report helped stymie panic-selling in E&O's mother share, but it did not translate to the E&O call warrants, which had a free-for-all selldown.
The E&O call warrants, which expire at the end of this month, opened the trading day some 81 per cent lower at three sen. It ended the day at 3.5 sen per call warrant with some 30 million call warrants traded.
Just last Friday, E&O was among the most sought-after stock on the exchange, with investors chasing the shares up to the maximum limit-up level, following a Web-based news portal's report that the SC will order Sime Darby Bhd to make a general offer for the E&O shares which they do not own.
A year ago, Sime Darby had bought some 30 per cent of E&O, a niche based high-end property developer from Penang.
The report said that the decision was made after a review by the commission's leadership under its new chairman Datuk Ranjit Ajit Singh.
However, the same evening, the SC released a statement saying that its position on the general offer requirement remained unchanged as per its statement issued October last year, which said that Sime Darby does not have to make a general offer for the remaining shares in E&O.
The regulator also added that it has started examining the trading activities associated with the relevant counters arising from the rumours.
By Business Times
Labels:
REIT / Property Investment
UM Land share holders advised to accept takeover offer
PETALING JAYA: Independent adviser Affin Investment Bank Bhd has advised minority shareholders of United Malayan Land Bhd (UM Land) to accept the takeover offer of RM2.50 per share by Seleksi Juang Sdn Bhd (SJSB) and parties acting in concert (PAC), who hold a combined 77.52%.
It said yesterday the RM2.50 offer price per share was fair and reasonable, as it was a 13 sen premium to the closing market price of RM2.37 on July 11, which was the last trading day prior to the takeover notice.
Affin Investment Bank also said UM Land's shares had not traded at or above the offer price for the past five years. “Holders should note that there is no assurance that the market price of the UM Land shares will remain trading at this level in the future,” it said in a circular to shareholders.
The stock traded at an average monthly volume of 881,758 shares, or 1.30% of the free float for the past year leading up to the offer date. Affin Investment cautioned the minority shareholders holding the remaining 22.48% of UM Land that the illiquidity of the shares may impact their ability to realise their investment in the open market.
It said as SJSB and the PAC held 77.52% of UM Land's total issued shares, irregardless of the level of acceptance of the offer, the company did not comply with the public shareholding spread requirement. SJSB and the PAC plan to delist the company from Bursa Malaysia Main Market.
Due to the fact that as at the date of notice, both SJSB and the PAC collectively held more than a 50% stake, the offer is not conditional upon any minimum number of valid acceptances of the offer shares being received.
If the company is delisted, its shares will no longer be able to be traded. “Holders should note that they may not be able to realise their investments at the same consideration under the offer and may encounter difficulties in disposing them,” Affin Investment said.
The offerors intend to privatise the company in order to have greater flexibility to plan and execute long-term business opportunities. It has a number of projects in the pipeline, which comprises of township and niche developments.
UM Land expects its township developments to contribute to earnings in the long term, as it requires an extended period of time. This may affect the company's ability to pay dividends in the future.
The company has been paying dividends for the past five years. It adopted a dividend policy of a 25% payout ratio, effective financial year ending Dec 31, 2012 (FY12).
As dividend policy is subject to availability of future investments and cashflow position of the company, there is no assurance to shareholders that the payout ratio will hold at the same level.
UM Land had announced on July 12 that had it received a takeover offer from SJSB and the PAC to buy the remaining 22.48%, or 67.81 million shares, not already owned by them for a cash consideration of RM2.50 per share.
Analysts had said that it was a good deal for the parties offering to buy out the company as the offer price represented a discount of about 18% from UM Land's net asset value per share of RM3.04.
In the first quarter ending March 31, UM Land posted a lower net profit of RM136,000 compared with RM13.97mil in the same period last year. Revenue had also fallen to RM51.6mil from RM82.2mil previously. UM Land shares closed at RM2.49 yesterday.
By The Star
It said yesterday the RM2.50 offer price per share was fair and reasonable, as it was a 13 sen premium to the closing market price of RM2.37 on July 11, which was the last trading day prior to the takeover notice.
Affin Investment Bank also said UM Land's shares had not traded at or above the offer price for the past five years. “Holders should note that there is no assurance that the market price of the UM Land shares will remain trading at this level in the future,” it said in a circular to shareholders.
The stock traded at an average monthly volume of 881,758 shares, or 1.30% of the free float for the past year leading up to the offer date. Affin Investment cautioned the minority shareholders holding the remaining 22.48% of UM Land that the illiquidity of the shares may impact their ability to realise their investment in the open market.
It said as SJSB and the PAC held 77.52% of UM Land's total issued shares, irregardless of the level of acceptance of the offer, the company did not comply with the public shareholding spread requirement. SJSB and the PAC plan to delist the company from Bursa Malaysia Main Market.
Due to the fact that as at the date of notice, both SJSB and the PAC collectively held more than a 50% stake, the offer is not conditional upon any minimum number of valid acceptances of the offer shares being received.
If the company is delisted, its shares will no longer be able to be traded. “Holders should note that they may not be able to realise their investments at the same consideration under the offer and may encounter difficulties in disposing them,” Affin Investment said.
The offerors intend to privatise the company in order to have greater flexibility to plan and execute long-term business opportunities. It has a number of projects in the pipeline, which comprises of township and niche developments.
UM Land expects its township developments to contribute to earnings in the long term, as it requires an extended period of time. This may affect the company's ability to pay dividends in the future.
The company has been paying dividends for the past five years. It adopted a dividend policy of a 25% payout ratio, effective financial year ending Dec 31, 2012 (FY12).
As dividend policy is subject to availability of future investments and cashflow position of the company, there is no assurance to shareholders that the payout ratio will hold at the same level.
UM Land had announced on July 12 that had it received a takeover offer from SJSB and the PAC to buy the remaining 22.48%, or 67.81 million shares, not already owned by them for a cash consideration of RM2.50 per share.
Analysts had said that it was a good deal for the parties offering to buy out the company as the offer price represented a discount of about 18% from UM Land's net asset value per share of RM3.04.
In the first quarter ending March 31, UM Land posted a lower net profit of RM136,000 compared with RM13.97mil in the same period last year. Revenue had also fallen to RM51.6mil from RM82.2mil previously. UM Land shares closed at RM2.49 yesterday.
By The Star
Labels:
REIT / Property Investment
Monday, August 13, 2012
I-Berhad to fast track i-City
The RM5 billion i-City project in Shah Alam, Selangor, is 20 per cent completed.
I-BERHAD is speeding up the developments of its RM5 billion i-City project in Shah Alam, Selangor.
Executive chairman Tan Sri Lim Kim Hong said the company had also been approached by several parties to replicate the i-City project in other cities.
"We will consider replicating i-City when the project is about 50 per cent completed. We expect to reach that in three to four years," Lim said after a dialogue session at Balai Berita, here, yesterday.
The 42ha i-City is a knowledge and tourism project with 18 office towers and residences, three hotels, a one million sq ft mall, a cybercentre, shop offices and retail units.
It will also have several leisure components like a snow walk, a theme park and a waterpark.
The project is 20 per cent completed.
Lim, who owns a 65 per cent stake in I-Berhad, has invested more than RM1 billion in the i-City project over the last five years.
In the next six months, I-Berhad will start building Soho (small-office-home-office) and Sovo (small-office-versatile-office) units, the mall and a three-star hotel.
There will be a total of 950 Soho and 220 Sovo units, with combined gross development value (GDV) of close to RM600 million.
For the mall and hotel, Lim said I-Berhad was expected to ink a deal within the next two to three months with international operators to jointly build and manage the properties.
Lim said in the next three years, the property development division would be the biggest revenue generator for the company,
I-Berhad aims to launch RM500 million worth of properties a year at i-City. This will give it a steady revenue of about RM500 million per annum from 2014.
Lim said he also expected the leisure division to hold strong, raking in RM50 million in revenue next year and up to 40 per cent in profit margin.
For the financial year ended December 31 2011, I-Berhad registered a pre-tax profit of RM1.84 million on revenues of RM27.3 million.
By Business Times
I-BERHAD is speeding up the developments of its RM5 billion i-City project in Shah Alam, Selangor.
Executive chairman Tan Sri Lim Kim Hong said the company had also been approached by several parties to replicate the i-City project in other cities.
"We will consider replicating i-City when the project is about 50 per cent completed. We expect to reach that in three to four years," Lim said after a dialogue session at Balai Berita, here, yesterday.
The 42ha i-City is a knowledge and tourism project with 18 office towers and residences, three hotels, a one million sq ft mall, a cybercentre, shop offices and retail units.
It will also have several leisure components like a snow walk, a theme park and a waterpark.
The project is 20 per cent completed.
Lim, who owns a 65 per cent stake in I-Berhad, has invested more than RM1 billion in the i-City project over the last five years.
In the next six months, I-Berhad will start building Soho (small-office-home-office) and Sovo (small-office-versatile-office) units, the mall and a three-star hotel.
There will be a total of 950 Soho and 220 Sovo units, with combined gross development value (GDV) of close to RM600 million.
For the mall and hotel, Lim said I-Berhad was expected to ink a deal within the next two to three months with international operators to jointly build and manage the properties.
Lim said in the next three years, the property development division would be the biggest revenue generator for the company,
I-Berhad aims to launch RM500 million worth of properties a year at i-City. This will give it a steady revenue of about RM500 million per annum from 2014.
Lim said he also expected the leisure division to hold strong, raking in RM50 million in revenue next year and up to 40 per cent in profit margin.
For the financial year ended December 31 2011, I-Berhad registered a pre-tax profit of RM1.84 million on revenues of RM27.3 million.
By Business Times
A more active PHB will focus on property buys, development and act as master developer
“Our mandate is to invest in the local market,” Managing director and chief executive officer Datuk Kamalul Arifin Othman(pic) told StarBiz in an interview.
PETALING JAYA: Pelaburan Hartanah Bhd (PHB), a subsidiary and operating arm of Yayasan Amanah Hartanah Bumiputera, will focus on three core areas property acquisition, property development and being a master developer.
Managing director and chief executive officer Datuk Kamalul Arifin Othman said PHB would be more active in the local property scene as it sought to buy real estates in other state capitals.
“Our mandate is to invest in the local market,” he told StarBiz in an interview.
On the possibility of it going abroad, he said, “It is a possibility that we may one day buy assets overseas.”
Kamalul said that on the local front, PHB would like to have a presence in all the state capitals, including Sabah and Sarawak.
“We are actively pursuing our property acquisitions. We are going into property development and more into land banking. We are not going to stop just because the price of land is going up.”
He said PHB wanted to focus on these three areas because it aimed to increase the size of its Amanah Hartanah Bumiputera (AHB) fund.
Kamalul said the fund was launched in 2010 with a size of RM1bil which was sold in three months. “We want to increase the fund size this year, depending on the properties we are going to inject into AHB,” he said.
AHB is the first syariah-compliant fund backed by real estates. Unlike normal unit trust, PHB will buy the asset first and then only raise money.
“We buy the properties and transfer the beneficial ownership to the fund in the sense that every month, the fund is secured with rental guarantee,” he said.
PHB currently has several prominent and strategically located properties in the Klang Valley. The value of its total property assets to-date stands at RM1.5bil, generating a gross annual rental income of about RM100mil. This works out to an annual yield of 6.67%, with 160 tenants over nine projects.
Said Kamalul: “We will focus on acquiring property that will predominantly be completed Grade A buildings, go into property development, which we have already done in KL Sentral, and be a master developer.”
Some of the office buildings in its stable include four out of five blocks in Peremba Square, Menara Bumiputra-Commerce which is next to Sogo departmental store in the city, CP Tower in Section 16 Petaling Jaya, Wisma Consplant in Subang Jaya and Menara Prisma in Putrajaya.
It also owns two retail blocks in Peremba Square, DEMC Specialist Hospital that it purchased in November last year and industrial building Logistics Warehouse in Shah Alam, Selangor.
“We want to diversify our revenue (in order to be resilient),” he said.
Kamalul said besides accummulating property assets for its recurring income, PHB's second core business was property development.
Its maiden project is Nu Sentral in KL Sentral. With a gross development value (GDV) of RM1.4bil, it will comprise a seven-storey mall with gross floor area of 1.1 million sq ft and nett lettable area of 650,000sq ft. It will be KL Sentral's first mall.
The second component of the development is a 27-storey office building Menara 1 Sentrum at Nu Sentral with estimated gross floor area of 640,000 sq ft and net lettable area of 450,000 sq ft. It will be built according to specifications of LEED Silver green building. LEED is the acronym for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).
Both components of its Nu Sentral project the mall and the office block are expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2013 and will have about 2,000 parking bays.
In terms of site location and frontage, Kamalul said it would be among the best. A bridge will be constructed to link the mall to the transport interchange.
Possible tenants for the mall include Parkson, cineplex operator Golden Screen Cinemas GSC, Wesria Food Sdn Bhd which will operate and manage a food court, a bowling alley and an MPH bookstore. Mydin will be introducing a new brand at the mall.
PHB will retain ownership of the entire project. “Rental lease will be competitive with other retail lots in KL Sentral,” Kamalul said.
PHB's second property development is the extension of Gleneagles Hospital that is expected to be completed in three years. It has signed an agreement with Gleneagles to build the medical facilities with a GDV of RM150mil and has signed a long lease with the hospital operator.
The remainder of its five acres at the Gleneagles extension will be used to build serviced apartments and PHB is already in discussions with several operators. PHB will own the asset but it will be managed and operated by another party.
“The patients at Gleneagles Hospital are very high profile. They and their family need a place to stay and rest,” said Kamalul.
On PHB's plan of becoming a master developer, Kamalul said this would be done at the former Lever Brothers land in Bangsar which it bought from Perbadanan Aset Keretapi.
“We have submitted our masterplan to the City Hall and it is currently being evaluated. We want to be the master developer for that land.
“We are going to plan the development and we will get the developer to build for us. But the important criteria is, they must give value-added proposals. For example, they develop the land and at the same time, provide a tenant to take up a substantial portion of the place.”
Kamalul said the project would be a mixed integrated community development which would include high-end condominium, retail centres and office buidings.
“It will be developed in phases. On the demand side, it will be green in terms of getting the credentials. That will keep us busy for the next several years. There may be opportunities for joint ventures with some of the parties involved,” he said.
By The Star
PETALING JAYA: Pelaburan Hartanah Bhd (PHB), a subsidiary and operating arm of Yayasan Amanah Hartanah Bumiputera, will focus on three core areas property acquisition, property development and being a master developer.
Managing director and chief executive officer Datuk Kamalul Arifin Othman said PHB would be more active in the local property scene as it sought to buy real estates in other state capitals.
“Our mandate is to invest in the local market,” he told StarBiz in an interview.
On the possibility of it going abroad, he said, “It is a possibility that we may one day buy assets overseas.”
Kamalul said that on the local front, PHB would like to have a presence in all the state capitals, including Sabah and Sarawak.
“We are actively pursuing our property acquisitions. We are going into property development and more into land banking. We are not going to stop just because the price of land is going up.”
He said PHB wanted to focus on these three areas because it aimed to increase the size of its Amanah Hartanah Bumiputera (AHB) fund.
Kamalul said the fund was launched in 2010 with a size of RM1bil which was sold in three months. “We want to increase the fund size this year, depending on the properties we are going to inject into AHB,” he said.
AHB is the first syariah-compliant fund backed by real estates. Unlike normal unit trust, PHB will buy the asset first and then only raise money.
“We buy the properties and transfer the beneficial ownership to the fund in the sense that every month, the fund is secured with rental guarantee,” he said.
PHB currently has several prominent and strategically located properties in the Klang Valley. The value of its total property assets to-date stands at RM1.5bil, generating a gross annual rental income of about RM100mil. This works out to an annual yield of 6.67%, with 160 tenants over nine projects.
Said Kamalul: “We will focus on acquiring property that will predominantly be completed Grade A buildings, go into property development, which we have already done in KL Sentral, and be a master developer.”
Some of the office buildings in its stable include four out of five blocks in Peremba Square, Menara Bumiputra-Commerce which is next to Sogo departmental store in the city, CP Tower in Section 16 Petaling Jaya, Wisma Consplant in Subang Jaya and Menara Prisma in Putrajaya.
It also owns two retail blocks in Peremba Square, DEMC Specialist Hospital that it purchased in November last year and industrial building Logistics Warehouse in Shah Alam, Selangor.
“We want to diversify our revenue (in order to be resilient),” he said.
Kamalul said besides accummulating property assets for its recurring income, PHB's second core business was property development.
Its maiden project is Nu Sentral in KL Sentral. With a gross development value (GDV) of RM1.4bil, it will comprise a seven-storey mall with gross floor area of 1.1 million sq ft and nett lettable area of 650,000sq ft. It will be KL Sentral's first mall.
The second component of the development is a 27-storey office building Menara 1 Sentrum at Nu Sentral with estimated gross floor area of 640,000 sq ft and net lettable area of 450,000 sq ft. It will be built according to specifications of LEED Silver green building. LEED is the acronym for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).
Both components of its Nu Sentral project the mall and the office block are expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2013 and will have about 2,000 parking bays.
In terms of site location and frontage, Kamalul said it would be among the best. A bridge will be constructed to link the mall to the transport interchange.
Possible tenants for the mall include Parkson, cineplex operator Golden Screen Cinemas GSC, Wesria Food Sdn Bhd which will operate and manage a food court, a bowling alley and an MPH bookstore. Mydin will be introducing a new brand at the mall.
PHB will retain ownership of the entire project. “Rental lease will be competitive with other retail lots in KL Sentral,” Kamalul said.
PHB's second property development is the extension of Gleneagles Hospital that is expected to be completed in three years. It has signed an agreement with Gleneagles to build the medical facilities with a GDV of RM150mil and has signed a long lease with the hospital operator.
The remainder of its five acres at the Gleneagles extension will be used to build serviced apartments and PHB is already in discussions with several operators. PHB will own the asset but it will be managed and operated by another party.
“The patients at Gleneagles Hospital are very high profile. They and their family need a place to stay and rest,” said Kamalul.
On PHB's plan of becoming a master developer, Kamalul said this would be done at the former Lever Brothers land in Bangsar which it bought from Perbadanan Aset Keretapi.
“We have submitted our masterplan to the City Hall and it is currently being evaluated. We want to be the master developer for that land.
“We are going to plan the development and we will get the developer to build for us. But the important criteria is, they must give value-added proposals. For example, they develop the land and at the same time, provide a tenant to take up a substantial portion of the place.”
Kamalul said the project would be a mixed integrated community development which would include high-end condominium, retail centres and office buidings.
“It will be developed in phases. On the demand side, it will be green in terms of getting the credentials. That will keep us busy for the next several years. There may be opportunities for joint ventures with some of the parties involved,” he said.
By The Star
Labels:
Property Market
KLCC Properties posts higher pre-tax profit
KLCC Properties Holdings Bhd chalked up a higher pre-tax profit of RM184.45 million for the second quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared with RM148.41 million registered in the same period last year.
Revenue rose to RM288.61 million, during the period under review, from RM240.3 million recorded previously, it said in a statement.
"Revenue from property investment increased 21.5 per cent to RM126 million in the second quarter primarily due to the maiden recognition of rental revenue from Menara 3 Petronas and upward rent revisions in Menara Dayabumi and Menara ExxonMobil.
"This segment also benefited from lower finance cost due to the Midciti refinancing undertaken in October last year," it said.
However, KLCC Properties said this was partially offset by finance costs incurred on Menara 3 Petronas which was previously capitalised during the construction phase.
The company said the results for the remaining year would remain stable due to long-term office tenancies and expected improvement in retail occupancy.
"The hotel segment will continue to trade in a competitive environment," it added.
By Bernama
Revenue rose to RM288.61 million, during the period under review, from RM240.3 million recorded previously, it said in a statement.
"Revenue from property investment increased 21.5 per cent to RM126 million in the second quarter primarily due to the maiden recognition of rental revenue from Menara 3 Petronas and upward rent revisions in Menara Dayabumi and Menara ExxonMobil.
"This segment also benefited from lower finance cost due to the Midciti refinancing undertaken in October last year," it said.
However, KLCC Properties said this was partially offset by finance costs incurred on Menara 3 Petronas which was previously capitalised during the construction phase.
The company said the results for the remaining year would remain stable due to long-term office tenancies and expected improvement in retail occupancy.
"The hotel segment will continue to trade in a competitive environment," it added.
By Bernama
E&O plunges on trading probe
Eastern & Oriental Bhd, a Malaysian property developer, fell the most in six years after the Securities Commission said it’s investigating a surge in its shares last week when an online newspaper “rumor” that the regulator may order Sime Darby Bhd to make a general offer.
The stock sank as much as 18 per cent in Kuala Lumpur trading to RM1.56, its largest intraday decline since June 6, 2006 and today’s biggest drop in the FTSE Bursa Malaysia Top 100 Index, which gained 0.2 per cent. It pared losses to RM1.60 at 10:41 a.m. local time.
E&O jumped 28 per cent on Aug 10, the most since August 2003, after the Malaysian Insider reported that the commission would U-turn and order Sime Darby to make a general offer after acquiring a 30 per cent stake last year. Last October’s decision that this isn’t required remains unchanged and is subject to a judicial review pending in court, the regulator said in an e- mailed statement the same day.
“The clarification by the Securities Commission should put to rest such speculation for now,” Terence Wong, head of research at Kuala Lumpur-based CIMB Group Holdings Bhd., wrote in a report today. “We were very surprised by the Malaysian Insider report. We expect E&O’s share price to give back most of Friday’s 42 sen gain immediately.”
Palm oil producer Sime Darby agreed to pay RM766 million (US$246 million), or RM2.30 per share, for its E&O stake in August last year to expand its Malaysian real estate business. That was a 59 percent premium to its last closing price at the time and 55 per cent more than E&O’s share price on Aug. 9 before the Insider report. General offers are typically made at the original acquisition price.
Examination Underway
The commission has begun an examination of trading arising from “the rumor,” its statement said.
Investors should wait for E&O’s shares to fall to about RM1.50 before accumulating the stock, said CIMB’s Wong, who kept his trading buy call. This means the stock’s total return is expected to exceed the benchmark FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Index by at least 5 per cent over the next three months.
“Longer-term fundamental prospects of the group remain promising as its Penang properties are selling well and the launch of new projects in Kuala Lumpur and Johor in the fourth quarter of 2012 and first quarter of 2013 should excite the market,” he said.
By Bloomberg
The stock sank as much as 18 per cent in Kuala Lumpur trading to RM1.56, its largest intraday decline since June 6, 2006 and today’s biggest drop in the FTSE Bursa Malaysia Top 100 Index, which gained 0.2 per cent. It pared losses to RM1.60 at 10:41 a.m. local time.
E&O jumped 28 per cent on Aug 10, the most since August 2003, after the Malaysian Insider reported that the commission would U-turn and order Sime Darby to make a general offer after acquiring a 30 per cent stake last year. Last October’s decision that this isn’t required remains unchanged and is subject to a judicial review pending in court, the regulator said in an e- mailed statement the same day.
“The clarification by the Securities Commission should put to rest such speculation for now,” Terence Wong, head of research at Kuala Lumpur-based CIMB Group Holdings Bhd., wrote in a report today. “We were very surprised by the Malaysian Insider report. We expect E&O’s share price to give back most of Friday’s 42 sen gain immediately.”
Palm oil producer Sime Darby agreed to pay RM766 million (US$246 million), or RM2.30 per share, for its E&O stake in August last year to expand its Malaysian real estate business. That was a 59 percent premium to its last closing price at the time and 55 per cent more than E&O’s share price on Aug. 9 before the Insider report. General offers are typically made at the original acquisition price.
Examination Underway
The commission has begun an examination of trading arising from “the rumor,” its statement said.
Investors should wait for E&O’s shares to fall to about RM1.50 before accumulating the stock, said CIMB’s Wong, who kept his trading buy call. This means the stock’s total return is expected to exceed the benchmark FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Index by at least 5 per cent over the next three months.
“Longer-term fundamental prospects of the group remain promising as its Penang properties are selling well and the launch of new projects in Kuala Lumpur and Johor in the fourth quarter of 2012 and first quarter of 2013 should excite the market,” he said.
By Bloomberg
Labels:
REIT / Property Investment
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Are developers really making too much?
LATELY, there have been many ongoing discussions on the topic of high property prices. It made me ponder on the various causes that might have contributed to the situation, including the question of whether developers are making too much.
As I took a sip of tea, many thoughts came to mind which I found interesting and worth sharing before we dwell further into the real factors of rising property prices.
Based on annual reports (see chart) of three major property developers in Malaysia, namely SP Setia, UEM Land Holdings and Mah Sing Group, they are generating an average of 18% profit margin from their projects, and at the same time incurring a staff cost of about 7% of their total revenue.
These companies are major developers in mass residential properties which have high sales turnover, and therefore a good reflection of the average developers' profit margin in the residential market.
These findings may contrast with people's perception of the profitability of the property development industry.
Though it may sound like a fantasy, assuming I could convince these three property developers to give back their entire profit to their customers, it would mean an average of 18% discount on property prices for the year in question.
This would seem like a fantastic bonanza for the buyers of the properties in question. But would a 18% discount really make these properties affordable? I would imagine that people will still find these properties expensive.
Let's take an example of a terrace house that costs RM700,000 in Petaling Jaya. It would be priced at RM574,000 after the 18% discount.
If a home buyer is able to secure a 90% loan with a maximum repayment period of 30 years, the monthly loan instalment for RM700,000 and RM574,000 would be RM3,081 and RM2,526 respectively (based on a BLR-2.4% loan package with current BLR at 6.6% per annum).
From the above example, while the discount may seem substantial at absolute price, it is not significant in terms of monthly loan instalment for home buyers.
The debt commitment level for the latter is still considered high and out of reach for most people especially those who have just started their career.
Now, let's take a hypothetical scenario that the property developers decide to make their staff work for free that year.
It would mean another 7% discount to customers after deducting staff cost. Even with this total discount of 25%, property prices in many areas would still be considered unaffordable to many.
Anyhow, back to reality, it is impossible for any commercial enterprise to work for free or give up its profit if it was to run a sustainable business, as well as to satisfy its shareholders' expectations.
For the property development industry which has a product life cycle of four to six years (starting from land acquisition to handover of keys to customers), it is a challenge to further compress the profit margin after taking into account the risk and inflationary factors involved in such a long product life cycle.
Let us look at other industries as a comparison and review their profit margins.
For the banking industry, the three largest local banks that were selected are Maybank, CIMB and Public Bank. Likewise, the three major players from the mobile telecommunication services were Axiata, Maxis and Digi.
The results showed that the average profit margin for the banking industry is 35%, while the mobile telecommunication industry is enjoying an average profit margin of 26%. So, back to my question “are developers in Malaysia really making too much?”
Compared with the average profit margin of the banking and telecommunication industries, the profit margins of property development companies are significantly lower and definitely not on par in terms of the actual profit before tax figures.
Putting aside the profit margin for property development which is already relatively low compared with the other two industries, what are the other factors that are causing high property prices?
Many other underlying factors could be looked into in relation to the escalating property prices, instead of merely contemplating the issue as a market trend or as a result of developers' profits.
The Government, property developers, home buyers, as well as NGOs (non-government organisations) will need to work together to identify the root causes of inadequate supply of affordable homes in Malaysia.
Let's ponder this issue over the next few weeks and I welcome any suggestions and feedback to shed some light on it as I dwell further into this crucial topic in my next article.
FIABCI Asia-Pacific chairman Datuk Alan Tong has over 50 years of experience in property development. He is also the group chairman of Bukit Kiara Properties. For feedback, please email feedback@fiabci-asiapacific.com.
By The Star
As I took a sip of tea, many thoughts came to mind which I found interesting and worth sharing before we dwell further into the real factors of rising property prices.
Based on annual reports (see chart) of three major property developers in Malaysia, namely SP Setia, UEM Land Holdings and Mah Sing Group, they are generating an average of 18% profit margin from their projects, and at the same time incurring a staff cost of about 7% of their total revenue.
These companies are major developers in mass residential properties which have high sales turnover, and therefore a good reflection of the average developers' profit margin in the residential market.
These findings may contrast with people's perception of the profitability of the property development industry.
Though it may sound like a fantasy, assuming I could convince these three property developers to give back their entire profit to their customers, it would mean an average of 18% discount on property prices for the year in question.
This would seem like a fantastic bonanza for the buyers of the properties in question. But would a 18% discount really make these properties affordable? I would imagine that people will still find these properties expensive.
Let's take an example of a terrace house that costs RM700,000 in Petaling Jaya. It would be priced at RM574,000 after the 18% discount.
If a home buyer is able to secure a 90% loan with a maximum repayment period of 30 years, the monthly loan instalment for RM700,000 and RM574,000 would be RM3,081 and RM2,526 respectively (based on a BLR-2.4% loan package with current BLR at 6.6% per annum).
From the above example, while the discount may seem substantial at absolute price, it is not significant in terms of monthly loan instalment for home buyers.
The debt commitment level for the latter is still considered high and out of reach for most people especially those who have just started their career.
Now, let's take a hypothetical scenario that the property developers decide to make their staff work for free that year.
It would mean another 7% discount to customers after deducting staff cost. Even with this total discount of 25%, property prices in many areas would still be considered unaffordable to many.
Anyhow, back to reality, it is impossible for any commercial enterprise to work for free or give up its profit if it was to run a sustainable business, as well as to satisfy its shareholders' expectations.
For the property development industry which has a product life cycle of four to six years (starting from land acquisition to handover of keys to customers), it is a challenge to further compress the profit margin after taking into account the risk and inflationary factors involved in such a long product life cycle.
Let us look at other industries as a comparison and review their profit margins.
For the banking industry, the three largest local banks that were selected are Maybank, CIMB and Public Bank. Likewise, the three major players from the mobile telecommunication services were Axiata, Maxis and Digi.
The results showed that the average profit margin for the banking industry is 35%, while the mobile telecommunication industry is enjoying an average profit margin of 26%. So, back to my question “are developers in Malaysia really making too much?”
Compared with the average profit margin of the banking and telecommunication industries, the profit margins of property development companies are significantly lower and definitely not on par in terms of the actual profit before tax figures.
Putting aside the profit margin for property development which is already relatively low compared with the other two industries, what are the other factors that are causing high property prices?
Many other underlying factors could be looked into in relation to the escalating property prices, instead of merely contemplating the issue as a market trend or as a result of developers' profits.
The Government, property developers, home buyers, as well as NGOs (non-government organisations) will need to work together to identify the root causes of inadequate supply of affordable homes in Malaysia.
Let's ponder this issue over the next few weeks and I welcome any suggestions and feedback to shed some light on it as I dwell further into this crucial topic in my next article.
FIABCI Asia-Pacific chairman Datuk Alan Tong has over 50 years of experience in property development. He is also the group chairman of Bukit Kiara Properties. For feedback, please email feedback@fiabci-asiapacific.com.
By The Star
Labels:
Property Market
A question of demand and supply
What the Tun Razak Exchange could look like.
A BIG pipeline of commercial properties in and around the city centre itching to be launched over the next decade or so is stoking concerns by the day – will there be sufficient demand for all these buildings?
1Malaysia Development Bhd, the master developer of the massive RM26bil Tun Razak Exchange development is fully aware of such concerns.
Close to half of the TRX real estate project will comprise office buildings. The project comes along at a time when many other mammoth commercial projects such as the re-development of 926ha Rubber Research Institute (RRI) Malaysia land in Sungai Buloh and Permodalan Nasional Bhd’s proposed 100-storey Menara Warisan Merdeka are poised to take off.
Naturally, the question of oversupply is posed to the government agency.
“The easy answer to such concerns is... that our interest is aligned towards making sure that there is not going to be an oversupply,” says 1MDB chief executive officer Datuk Shahrol Halmi.
“As a government agency, 1MDB is cognisant of the impression that... look, we are the Government, a 800-pound gorilla, therefore we can squeeze people (private developers) out,” he says, referring to the fact that the agency is spearheading such a big project in one of the city centre’s prime areas.
“But I ask you... is it the Government’s job to go and regulate the area of square footage that is available in the market – is that a good idea?
Is it then fair to say if there is better quality that is available on a certain side then that would be our chosen place?” he asks.
“The reality is that it is not the Government’s interest to destroy the economy of the city,” Shahrol says.
How then do we address concerns of oversupply?
“Via market researches, do studies on commercial property demand, moving forward – let market economics dictate,” he says.
Cause for Concern?
As it is now, there is already an oversupply of commercial properties in and around the city centre, according to Henry Butcher Malaysia director Lim Eng Chong.
And the figures seem to back that premise up.
International property consultant VPC director and chartered surveyor James Wong says the take-up rate for office buildings which are being built and will be completed this year stands at below 50%.
“This is for commercial properties in and around the city, but the same scenario exists further away from KL, such as in Cyberjaya; there is already an oversupply situation,” Wong says.
However, the market will tend to correct itself in time to come, he adds.
David Jarnell, senior vice-president and head of research at Malaysia’s Jones Lang Wootton writes in a recent report that this year alone, the prime office market in the city centre is expected to increase by 2.04 million sq ft with the delivery of several prime office buildings.
“The average occupancy rate in KL city centre declined from 84.9% in the fourth quarter 2011 to 81.3% in first quarter this year as the newly completed offices did not yet register any physical occupation,” he writes in his report from which an extract was published in StarBizWeek in June.
Jarnell further notes in his report that in the first quarter this year, the average net rental reduced marginally as many landlords were still maintaining the same rental rates.
Despite all of this, Henry Butcher’s Lim points out there is a saving grace.
The fact that the Government is pushing for so many economic projects as part of its larger plan to drive the country towards higher productivity and income will help attract foreign direct investments (FDIs) and congregate talents and innovators in the country.
This will inevitably produce demand for not only commercial properties but also other property types.
“The financial and economic reforms, if carried out properly, will get the intended results,” Lim says.
“The TRX project is exciting, but more than real-estate, the entire economic reform idea is a progressive one – if it is realised well, it will gel well with mega projects such as the TRX,” Lim says.
VPC’s Wong points out that in order to create effective demand for commercial properties, the country needs FDIs which will bring in the multinational corporations.
In this regard, mega projects like the TRX are needed, but with a twist.
“We need the FDIs to come but before that we need mega developments like the TRX, but with mega developments come the risk of depleting demand,” Wong says.
By The Star
A BIG pipeline of commercial properties in and around the city centre itching to be launched over the next decade or so is stoking concerns by the day – will there be sufficient demand for all these buildings?
1Malaysia Development Bhd, the master developer of the massive RM26bil Tun Razak Exchange development is fully aware of such concerns.
Close to half of the TRX real estate project will comprise office buildings. The project comes along at a time when many other mammoth commercial projects such as the re-development of 926ha Rubber Research Institute (RRI) Malaysia land in Sungai Buloh and Permodalan Nasional Bhd’s proposed 100-storey Menara Warisan Merdeka are poised to take off.
Naturally, the question of oversupply is posed to the government agency.
“The easy answer to such concerns is... that our interest is aligned towards making sure that there is not going to be an oversupply,” says 1MDB chief executive officer Datuk Shahrol Halmi.
“As a government agency, 1MDB is cognisant of the impression that... look, we are the Government, a 800-pound gorilla, therefore we can squeeze people (private developers) out,” he says, referring to the fact that the agency is spearheading such a big project in one of the city centre’s prime areas.
“But I ask you... is it the Government’s job to go and regulate the area of square footage that is available in the market – is that a good idea?
Is it then fair to say if there is better quality that is available on a certain side then that would be our chosen place?” he asks.
“The reality is that it is not the Government’s interest to destroy the economy of the city,” Shahrol says.
How then do we address concerns of oversupply?
“Via market researches, do studies on commercial property demand, moving forward – let market economics dictate,” he says.
Cause for Concern?
As it is now, there is already an oversupply of commercial properties in and around the city centre, according to Henry Butcher Malaysia director Lim Eng Chong.
And the figures seem to back that premise up.
International property consultant VPC director and chartered surveyor James Wong says the take-up rate for office buildings which are being built and will be completed this year stands at below 50%.
“This is for commercial properties in and around the city, but the same scenario exists further away from KL, such as in Cyberjaya; there is already an oversupply situation,” Wong says.
However, the market will tend to correct itself in time to come, he adds.
David Jarnell, senior vice-president and head of research at Malaysia’s Jones Lang Wootton writes in a recent report that this year alone, the prime office market in the city centre is expected to increase by 2.04 million sq ft with the delivery of several prime office buildings.
“The average occupancy rate in KL city centre declined from 84.9% in the fourth quarter 2011 to 81.3% in first quarter this year as the newly completed offices did not yet register any physical occupation,” he writes in his report from which an extract was published in StarBizWeek in June.
Jarnell further notes in his report that in the first quarter this year, the average net rental reduced marginally as many landlords were still maintaining the same rental rates.
Despite all of this, Henry Butcher’s Lim points out there is a saving grace.
The fact that the Government is pushing for so many economic projects as part of its larger plan to drive the country towards higher productivity and income will help attract foreign direct investments (FDIs) and congregate talents and innovators in the country.
This will inevitably produce demand for not only commercial properties but also other property types.
“The financial and economic reforms, if carried out properly, will get the intended results,” Lim says.
“The TRX project is exciting, but more than real-estate, the entire economic reform idea is a progressive one – if it is realised well, it will gel well with mega projects such as the TRX,” Lim says.
VPC’s Wong points out that in order to create effective demand for commercial properties, the country needs FDIs which will bring in the multinational corporations.
In this regard, mega projects like the TRX are needed, but with a twist.
“We need the FDIs to come but before that we need mega developments like the TRX, but with mega developments come the risk of depleting demand,” Wong says.
By The Star
Next generation development concept
Artist impression of Tun Razak Exchange in Kuala Lumpur.
1MDB will spare no effort in building the state-of-the-art Tun Razak Exchange.
UNLIKE other ground-breaking ceremonies where VIPs often sweat it out in the blazing sun with a shovel in their hand to mark the occasion, the one for Kuala Lumpur's newest and arguably swankiest financial district was done in style and comfort.
In one late July afternoon near Jalan Tun Razak, the VVIP who got the project officially off was Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. What he did was just touch a LED sphere that rose right before him in a makeshift air-conditioned hall and within seconds, images of a huge excavator loading gravel onto a lorry appeared on two large screens. That was it. No heat, no sweat, just a simple ceremony to mark the momentous occasion, and powered by technology.
And it will be smart technology, a digital backbone, eco-friendly elements and a garden city that will be the hallmarks of a futuristic city for modern living and working. When the cement and paint dries, the Tun Razak Exchange (TRX) will mould and alter the increasingly towering skyline of Kuala Lumpur.
Shahrol: ‘We have locked in a strategic investor for phase one.’
Named after the prime minister's father (Tun Razak), TRX will house 26 buildings over a 70-acre site on the fringes of the Kuala Lumpur city centre. It is designed to house hundreds of multinational companies, financial institutions, government agencies, hotels and support services. The project has an eye-popping gross development value of RM26bil.
Though a lot of planning has gone into the design of the new district, the question is will it be enough to thrust KL into one of the top 20 livable cities in the world? Will it be a financial hub that can attract the big deals and talent that seems to gravitate to Singapore and Hong Kong? Would its emergence create a glut in the real estate sector?
And what will it take to turn this whole dream into reality?
The detractors are already in full voice. They are so sure this new futuristic city will become another “white elephant.” But its master developer, 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB), is convinced otherwise. It's sure that TRX will not just change how real estate is developed in the city and inevitably raise the standards of future developments, but it will become an oasis for global companies to reside and an area for talent creation. Encapsulating all of that, it will be a place where enough and sustainable economic activity will be created.
“People are willing to bear the high cost of living in London because it has everything, from being a financial hub to the connectivity, shopping, gourmet, the art galleries... we want to strive for that.
“We are like a part of this one big jigsaw puzzle and TRX can only address the overall vision of the Government when the other pieces are also moving. The reality is that it requires a lot of effort,” 1MDB chief executive officer Datuk Shahrol Halmi says.
He adds that “we are also not limiting ourselves to financial services. We are open to others so long it contributes to the vibrancy and diversity of the district.”
Big bucks from Abu Dhabi investor
To make sure this new district had all the trappings of a futuristic and livable city, the team visited places such as Rappongi in Japan, Hong Kong, Marina Bay in Singapore and Canary Whaft in London to extract the best of what those places have to offer.
Now that the design is in order, the question is who will fund this venture? Shahrol says “we have locked in a strategic investor for phase one and its infrastructure.”
But he is tight-lipped about the name of the investor. Those in the know say it is the Abu Dhabi government via Mubadala Development Company that is the key strategic investor. It is no coincidence that Mubadala had in October 2010 forged a collaboration with 1MDB with a view to explore joint key strategic projects in the Kuala Lumpur International Financial District or KLIFD, now known as TRX. Shahrol admits KLIFD was a “mouthful” to pronounce and tricky to remember, hence the name change.
The Abu Dhabi investor will bring RM3.5bil worth of FDI for the first phase of the TRX development, which will encompass three buildings on top of a mall plus the infrastructure. The first phase should be completed in 2016 and TRX is 15 year project.
The story does not end there.
There is interest to fund the entire infrastructure cost of TRX and both parties are locked in talks. If all parties are agreeable, the Abu Dhabi investors will bring in an additional RM2bil to fund the infrastructure work, which will bring the total FDI from them to RM5.5bil. And that puts TRX in a good spot, says an observer.
“It is that kind of momentum that can push this huge project through but we also need more strategic investors as this is a huge development,” he adds.
Shahrol did say 1MDB plans to lock in another strategic investor soon but did not elaborate.
Contrary to market belief that the biggest investors will be the Middle Eastern firms, Shahrol says “no, we are also looking beyond the Middle East.''
“We have enquires from all over the world, from investors, potential tenants, service providers and even technology firms (that want to be part of the development),'' he says.
Special advisor to the Japanese Cabinet Tadashi Maeda, who was at the launch on July 30, says he had written to the Malaysian government to express the interest of investors from his country to get involved in the development of TRX.
“The Japanese are definitely interested as they feel they have the technology to aid TRX,” says Shahrol.
“It is not a Middle Eastern and Japan play. There have been enquiries are from all over and there may be some government to government arrangements. Even some of the local players are keen to be party to this development,” says someone familiar with the mammoth project.
TRX will be developed in plots and indications are that it will be spread over four phases. But that will depend on how 1MDB wants its dream realised.
“We expect to have strategic investors where they will develop (some buildings) with us and there will be plot by plot joint ventures and also outright sale of land,” he says.
To Shahrol, it is about getting the momentum moving and then it can shift its focus and pitch towards its next priority. Local players will be part of the development including local construction companies, but a key component will be about raising the standards and quality to that of a world-class development in order to attract tenants.
“TRX can only address the overall vision of the Government when the other pieces are also moving. If there is no support, then it will be less than optimal,” he says,
But he is not about to let anything stop TRX from being a reality and he has a checklist of what needs to be done to make sure there is total cooperation and coordination in delivery.
Incentive competition
The concept of working with key strategic investors is similar to that deployed by Iskandar Malaysia and other corridors throughout the country. All dangle incentives to get the FDIs and it is no different for TRX. In fact, a task force has been set up to ensure no stone is left unturned in the planning and development of TRX.
That has raised concerns in the market place if the other corridor developments have a fleeting chance of getting more FDIs if TRX is going to be a magnet of interest from investors.
“The perception is that we are the favoured one, but Iskandar already has its own incentives, and so does the Northern, Southern and Eastern corridors. And when these projects were mooted, they had their own strengths.''
He says Iskandar's strength is that it is near Singapore, the Northern corridor's strength encompasses agriculture, while the Eastern corridor is more into oil and gas and support services.
“Why should Petronas suddenly scale back from the Eastern corridor (just because TRX has emerged) when they (are so entrenched in) Kertih, or why should Sime Darby scale back from the Northern corridor?
“Investors have their own reasons as to why they are investing in the corridors. They have their own sectors and strengths and each of the corridors have their own attraction and appeal,” he adds.
But Shahrol adds: “I cannot speak for the government (where the incentives are concerned) but as the owner and master developer, we would want (all the incentives) for TRX. Of course, there is a whole process of getting the incentives where many agencies such as the Finance Ministry, Securities Commission and Bank Negara are involved. It is really up to the policy-makers and they know how to balance and finalise the details.”
TRX is seen as an enabler and catalyst of the Government's Vision 2020 and the ETP initiative. It is supposed to spur new areas of growth, facilitate economic transformation and promote regional as well a global prosperity. The idea is also to create enough economic activities to create and aggregate talent and move towards a sustainable model for green initiatives. TRX is supposed to pioneer all of that, hence some of the incentives.
The incentives on offer include 100% income tax exemption for 10 years, stamp duty exemption on loan/service agreements, incentives for industrial building allowance and accelerated capital allowance and income tax exemption of 70% for five years for eligible property developers.
While 1MDB, which is wholly-owned by the Government, will spearhead the development of TRX, the Government will not fund the project and Shahrol makes it clear that “they did not write me a cheque, we had to pay RM230mil for the land.”
The potential glut
Shahrol does not believe there will be an oversupply of commercial buildings once TRX is built. He also does not subscribe to the notion that there will be a flight of quality tenants to TRX.
TRX is three minutes away from the Petronas Twin Towers and the Bukit Bintang tourist belt and a stone's throw away from the central business district in Jalan Sultan Ismail and Jalan Raja Chulan.
TRX, however, will share some of the features of those places but will differentiate itself from comparable business districts within Kuala Lumpur. It will have open spaces and parks to create a garden-like city. Of the 70 acres, 21 acres are for parks and open spaces. As for the buildings, there will be 26, one of which is the signature tower with 200,000 sq m of floor space.
Combined with the other towers, TRX will have nearly 900,000 sq m to offer when fully competed besides service apartments, hotels, conference and retail facilities and a cultural centre.
Hence the concerns.
Shahrol says: “We are not planning to go through the list of who is on that street and try to get them to TRX. We are more interested in who are the new players that we can entice, companies and businesses which will have otherwise set up regional centres in Hong Kong or Singapore.
“Of course, over time there is going to be a flight of quality tenants, but it will be a question of location where it makes business sense for them to move to TRX because of all there businesses there. This flight would also inevitably force the rest of KL to upgrade their services and we will be seen as raising the bar for real estate development for other parts of KL and elsewhere and that will eventually be good for the country,” he says.
He adds that “cannibalisation effect will be mitigated” and that in itself sets new standards in real estate and it is all these factors that can help push KL to be among the top 20 liveable cities.
“It is also a willingness issue on the part of property developments to push for higher standards so that there is no flight of tenants. If you do not adapt and change with the times then tenants will just move to places that offer better value,” adds an observer.
Competing ways
Kuala Lumpur has long fought a losing battle to be recognised as a financial hub in the region. It pales in comparison with financial centres such as Singapore and Hong Kong. But can TRX change the game?
“It would be tough given that some of the big deals are done in Singapore and, the republic and Hong Kong are recognised internationally as financial centres of this region,” says an observer.
But KL has the trump card when it comes to Islamic banking.
It has received global recognition as a hub for Islamic Banking. Islamic finance was worth just US$5bil (RM15.6bil) in 1985 and now it worth US$1 trillion (RM3.12 trillion) and the Malaysia's Islamic finance sector is already worth US$400bil (RM1.25 trillion) and the booming sector is set to triple in value in the coming decade, says a report.
“How do we compete? Well, you start with the first step, figure out what are the things that we need to do, which is infrastructure. And the Government is also looking to ease the way of doing business here. To say all the big deals are done in Singapore is not true. Just look at our recent IPOs, these deals are done here.
“If you actually start doing all of this correctly, providing a good environment, and we have inherent advantages as our cost is still a lot lower, and our talent, what if we create a business here for them?
“We are also not saying that we are going to compete with Singapore but what we are saying is that we want to leverage on our strengths. We have a good reputation and good momentum in Islamic finance and we just want to seize the day. The point is that it is better to do something than not do it at all,” he says.
He adds that TRX will also in no way be duplicating the Labuan Offshore Financial Centre.
“Labuan is an offshore centre and we are nothing like that. But you can compare us with (the central business district along) Jalan Sultan Ismail and Jalan Raja Chulan.”
The challenge
Among the many real estate projects in the city centre, KL Sentral has been pretty lucky in getting investors and tenants because a lot of planning went into the project. It is rare to plan on such a huge canvas; something similar with what TRX will be going through. What could potentially derail such a project of this size is a host of issues.
Shahrol says that in case of a slowdown “it does not make sense to push this through and it would not make logical sense to come up with a building in the middle of a recession.” That slowdown issue has been raised because of the fragile economic situation in Europe and the United States.
Getting to bed with the right partner is also critical, and to this, Shahrol says “the choice of parents is very important and it is a matter of picking the right partner.”
Forget about everything else, the biggest challenge to him is about “sticking with our original vision, where talent aggregates and value is created.”
By The Star
1MDB will spare no effort in building the state-of-the-art Tun Razak Exchange.
UNLIKE other ground-breaking ceremonies where VIPs often sweat it out in the blazing sun with a shovel in their hand to mark the occasion, the one for Kuala Lumpur's newest and arguably swankiest financial district was done in style and comfort.
In one late July afternoon near Jalan Tun Razak, the VVIP who got the project officially off was Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. What he did was just touch a LED sphere that rose right before him in a makeshift air-conditioned hall and within seconds, images of a huge excavator loading gravel onto a lorry appeared on two large screens. That was it. No heat, no sweat, just a simple ceremony to mark the momentous occasion, and powered by technology.
And it will be smart technology, a digital backbone, eco-friendly elements and a garden city that will be the hallmarks of a futuristic city for modern living and working. When the cement and paint dries, the Tun Razak Exchange (TRX) will mould and alter the increasingly towering skyline of Kuala Lumpur.
Shahrol: ‘We have locked in a strategic investor for phase one.’
Named after the prime minister's father (Tun Razak), TRX will house 26 buildings over a 70-acre site on the fringes of the Kuala Lumpur city centre. It is designed to house hundreds of multinational companies, financial institutions, government agencies, hotels and support services. The project has an eye-popping gross development value of RM26bil.
Though a lot of planning has gone into the design of the new district, the question is will it be enough to thrust KL into one of the top 20 livable cities in the world? Will it be a financial hub that can attract the big deals and talent that seems to gravitate to Singapore and Hong Kong? Would its emergence create a glut in the real estate sector?
And what will it take to turn this whole dream into reality?
The detractors are already in full voice. They are so sure this new futuristic city will become another “white elephant.” But its master developer, 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB), is convinced otherwise. It's sure that TRX will not just change how real estate is developed in the city and inevitably raise the standards of future developments, but it will become an oasis for global companies to reside and an area for talent creation. Encapsulating all of that, it will be a place where enough and sustainable economic activity will be created.
“People are willing to bear the high cost of living in London because it has everything, from being a financial hub to the connectivity, shopping, gourmet, the art galleries... we want to strive for that.
“We are like a part of this one big jigsaw puzzle and TRX can only address the overall vision of the Government when the other pieces are also moving. The reality is that it requires a lot of effort,” 1MDB chief executive officer Datuk Shahrol Halmi says.
He adds that “we are also not limiting ourselves to financial services. We are open to others so long it contributes to the vibrancy and diversity of the district.”
Big bucks from Abu Dhabi investor
To make sure this new district had all the trappings of a futuristic and livable city, the team visited places such as Rappongi in Japan, Hong Kong, Marina Bay in Singapore and Canary Whaft in London to extract the best of what those places have to offer.
Now that the design is in order, the question is who will fund this venture? Shahrol says “we have locked in a strategic investor for phase one and its infrastructure.”
But he is tight-lipped about the name of the investor. Those in the know say it is the Abu Dhabi government via Mubadala Development Company that is the key strategic investor. It is no coincidence that Mubadala had in October 2010 forged a collaboration with 1MDB with a view to explore joint key strategic projects in the Kuala Lumpur International Financial District or KLIFD, now known as TRX. Shahrol admits KLIFD was a “mouthful” to pronounce and tricky to remember, hence the name change.
The Abu Dhabi investor will bring RM3.5bil worth of FDI for the first phase of the TRX development, which will encompass three buildings on top of a mall plus the infrastructure. The first phase should be completed in 2016 and TRX is 15 year project.
The story does not end there.
There is interest to fund the entire infrastructure cost of TRX and both parties are locked in talks. If all parties are agreeable, the Abu Dhabi investors will bring in an additional RM2bil to fund the infrastructure work, which will bring the total FDI from them to RM5.5bil. And that puts TRX in a good spot, says an observer.
“It is that kind of momentum that can push this huge project through but we also need more strategic investors as this is a huge development,” he adds.
Shahrol did say 1MDB plans to lock in another strategic investor soon but did not elaborate.
Contrary to market belief that the biggest investors will be the Middle Eastern firms, Shahrol says “no, we are also looking beyond the Middle East.''
“We have enquires from all over the world, from investors, potential tenants, service providers and even technology firms (that want to be part of the development),'' he says.
Special advisor to the Japanese Cabinet Tadashi Maeda, who was at the launch on July 30, says he had written to the Malaysian government to express the interest of investors from his country to get involved in the development of TRX.
“The Japanese are definitely interested as they feel they have the technology to aid TRX,” says Shahrol.
“It is not a Middle Eastern and Japan play. There have been enquiries are from all over and there may be some government to government arrangements. Even some of the local players are keen to be party to this development,” says someone familiar with the mammoth project.
TRX will be developed in plots and indications are that it will be spread over four phases. But that will depend on how 1MDB wants its dream realised.
“We expect to have strategic investors where they will develop (some buildings) with us and there will be plot by plot joint ventures and also outright sale of land,” he says.
To Shahrol, it is about getting the momentum moving and then it can shift its focus and pitch towards its next priority. Local players will be part of the development including local construction companies, but a key component will be about raising the standards and quality to that of a world-class development in order to attract tenants.
“TRX can only address the overall vision of the Government when the other pieces are also moving. If there is no support, then it will be less than optimal,” he says,
But he is not about to let anything stop TRX from being a reality and he has a checklist of what needs to be done to make sure there is total cooperation and coordination in delivery.
Incentive competition
The concept of working with key strategic investors is similar to that deployed by Iskandar Malaysia and other corridors throughout the country. All dangle incentives to get the FDIs and it is no different for TRX. In fact, a task force has been set up to ensure no stone is left unturned in the planning and development of TRX.
That has raised concerns in the market place if the other corridor developments have a fleeting chance of getting more FDIs if TRX is going to be a magnet of interest from investors.
“The perception is that we are the favoured one, but Iskandar already has its own incentives, and so does the Northern, Southern and Eastern corridors. And when these projects were mooted, they had their own strengths.''
He says Iskandar's strength is that it is near Singapore, the Northern corridor's strength encompasses agriculture, while the Eastern corridor is more into oil and gas and support services.
“Why should Petronas suddenly scale back from the Eastern corridor (just because TRX has emerged) when they (are so entrenched in) Kertih, or why should Sime Darby scale back from the Northern corridor?
“Investors have their own reasons as to why they are investing in the corridors. They have their own sectors and strengths and each of the corridors have their own attraction and appeal,” he adds.
But Shahrol adds: “I cannot speak for the government (where the incentives are concerned) but as the owner and master developer, we would want (all the incentives) for TRX. Of course, there is a whole process of getting the incentives where many agencies such as the Finance Ministry, Securities Commission and Bank Negara are involved. It is really up to the policy-makers and they know how to balance and finalise the details.”
TRX is seen as an enabler and catalyst of the Government's Vision 2020 and the ETP initiative. It is supposed to spur new areas of growth, facilitate economic transformation and promote regional as well a global prosperity. The idea is also to create enough economic activities to create and aggregate talent and move towards a sustainable model for green initiatives. TRX is supposed to pioneer all of that, hence some of the incentives.
The incentives on offer include 100% income tax exemption for 10 years, stamp duty exemption on loan/service agreements, incentives for industrial building allowance and accelerated capital allowance and income tax exemption of 70% for five years for eligible property developers.
While 1MDB, which is wholly-owned by the Government, will spearhead the development of TRX, the Government will not fund the project and Shahrol makes it clear that “they did not write me a cheque, we had to pay RM230mil for the land.”
The potential glut
Shahrol does not believe there will be an oversupply of commercial buildings once TRX is built. He also does not subscribe to the notion that there will be a flight of quality tenants to TRX.
TRX is three minutes away from the Petronas Twin Towers and the Bukit Bintang tourist belt and a stone's throw away from the central business district in Jalan Sultan Ismail and Jalan Raja Chulan.
TRX, however, will share some of the features of those places but will differentiate itself from comparable business districts within Kuala Lumpur. It will have open spaces and parks to create a garden-like city. Of the 70 acres, 21 acres are for parks and open spaces. As for the buildings, there will be 26, one of which is the signature tower with 200,000 sq m of floor space.
Combined with the other towers, TRX will have nearly 900,000 sq m to offer when fully competed besides service apartments, hotels, conference and retail facilities and a cultural centre.
Hence the concerns.
Shahrol says: “We are not planning to go through the list of who is on that street and try to get them to TRX. We are more interested in who are the new players that we can entice, companies and businesses which will have otherwise set up regional centres in Hong Kong or Singapore.
“Of course, over time there is going to be a flight of quality tenants, but it will be a question of location where it makes business sense for them to move to TRX because of all there businesses there. This flight would also inevitably force the rest of KL to upgrade their services and we will be seen as raising the bar for real estate development for other parts of KL and elsewhere and that will eventually be good for the country,” he says.
He adds that “cannibalisation effect will be mitigated” and that in itself sets new standards in real estate and it is all these factors that can help push KL to be among the top 20 liveable cities.
“It is also a willingness issue on the part of property developments to push for higher standards so that there is no flight of tenants. If you do not adapt and change with the times then tenants will just move to places that offer better value,” adds an observer.
Competing ways
Kuala Lumpur has long fought a losing battle to be recognised as a financial hub in the region. It pales in comparison with financial centres such as Singapore and Hong Kong. But can TRX change the game?
“It would be tough given that some of the big deals are done in Singapore and, the republic and Hong Kong are recognised internationally as financial centres of this region,” says an observer.
But KL has the trump card when it comes to Islamic banking.
It has received global recognition as a hub for Islamic Banking. Islamic finance was worth just US$5bil (RM15.6bil) in 1985 and now it worth US$1 trillion (RM3.12 trillion) and the Malaysia's Islamic finance sector is already worth US$400bil (RM1.25 trillion) and the booming sector is set to triple in value in the coming decade, says a report.
“How do we compete? Well, you start with the first step, figure out what are the things that we need to do, which is infrastructure. And the Government is also looking to ease the way of doing business here. To say all the big deals are done in Singapore is not true. Just look at our recent IPOs, these deals are done here.
“If you actually start doing all of this correctly, providing a good environment, and we have inherent advantages as our cost is still a lot lower, and our talent, what if we create a business here for them?
“We are also not saying that we are going to compete with Singapore but what we are saying is that we want to leverage on our strengths. We have a good reputation and good momentum in Islamic finance and we just want to seize the day. The point is that it is better to do something than not do it at all,” he says.
He adds that TRX will also in no way be duplicating the Labuan Offshore Financial Centre.
“Labuan is an offshore centre and we are nothing like that. But you can compare us with (the central business district along) Jalan Sultan Ismail and Jalan Raja Chulan.”
The challenge
Among the many real estate projects in the city centre, KL Sentral has been pretty lucky in getting investors and tenants because a lot of planning went into the project. It is rare to plan on such a huge canvas; something similar with what TRX will be going through. What could potentially derail such a project of this size is a host of issues.
Shahrol says that in case of a slowdown “it does not make sense to push this through and it would not make logical sense to come up with a building in the middle of a recession.” That slowdown issue has been raised because of the fragile economic situation in Europe and the United States.
Getting to bed with the right partner is also critical, and to this, Shahrol says “the choice of parents is very important and it is a matter of picking the right partner.”
Forget about everything else, the biggest challenge to him is about “sticking with our original vision, where talent aggregates and value is created.”
By The Star
Rimbunan to complete 15 projects by end-2013
RIMBUNAN Corporate Advisory Sdn Bhd, which is tasked by the government to revive abandoned housing projects, expects to complete 15 such developments by end of 2013.
Rimbunan managing principal and founder Kumar Nathan said the company expects to complete seven projects by the end of this year and another eight next year.
"Although our company started in 2004, we only undertook abandoned housing projects in 2010 after we were appointed one of the 22 companies by the Ministry of Housing and Local Government to revive such projects," Kumar said in an interview with Business Times recently.
"We will complete the 15 projects, valued between RM130 million and RM140 million, before taking on new ones, including commercial buildings," he added.
Most of the abandoned projects were in Selangor, Johor, Penang and Kedah.
"We find that the majority of the abandoned projects were undertaken by developers who were first timers in the business," said Kumar.
According to the statistics provided by the government, so far this year there were 154 abandoned projects nationwide, of which 104 have been revived.
Kumar said the projects were mainly within the medium-low to low-cost apartments or houses.
"Usually these projects are done at a loss.
"That is why most of the time these projects are often abandoned," he added.
Kumar did not discount the possibility of the company undertaking its own property developments in the near future.
"We have the expertise and we know how to revive abandoned projects.
"We are definitely looking into property development but that will probably take place later.
"Right now we have our plate full with the abandoned projects," he added.
By Business Times
Rimbunan managing principal and founder Kumar Nathan said the company expects to complete seven projects by the end of this year and another eight next year.
"Although our company started in 2004, we only undertook abandoned housing projects in 2010 after we were appointed one of the 22 companies by the Ministry of Housing and Local Government to revive such projects," Kumar said in an interview with Business Times recently.
"We will complete the 15 projects, valued between RM130 million and RM140 million, before taking on new ones, including commercial buildings," he added.
Most of the abandoned projects were in Selangor, Johor, Penang and Kedah.
"We find that the majority of the abandoned projects were undertaken by developers who were first timers in the business," said Kumar.
According to the statistics provided by the government, so far this year there were 154 abandoned projects nationwide, of which 104 have been revived.
Kumar said the projects were mainly within the medium-low to low-cost apartments or houses.
"Usually these projects are done at a loss.
"That is why most of the time these projects are often abandoned," he added.
Kumar did not discount the possibility of the company undertaking its own property developments in the near future.
"We have the expertise and we know how to revive abandoned projects.
"We are definitely looking into property development but that will probably take place later.
"Right now we have our plate full with the abandoned projects," he added.
By Business Times
CEO sheds some light on project
1MDB has landed itself with the RM26bil Tun Razak Exchange. Its task is to ensure this mammoth project takes off and it becomes a major catalyst of growth for the future. StarBizWeek's B.K. Sidhu and Yvonne Tan met up with its CEO, Datuk Shahrol Halmi, who shared some of his thoughts on how TRX can be a reality. Here are excerpts of the interview:
SBW: Why the name TRX from KLIFD?
Over the years, we got feedback that KLIFD is bit of a mouthful to pronounce and hard to remember, so we thought it'll be good to go and find a good memorable name for the district. TRX came about because it's on Jalan Tun Razak and we are just taking the cue from Wall Street, which is named after an actual street.
What's the role of the Government in TRX and why must the Government be driving it?
Because the Government is driving the ETP and who else is better to catalyse this than the Government?
The Government is going to start the ball rolling by doing up the master plan and setting standards. The developers will be invited to participate.
What if there are no “A” grade tenants for TRX?
There will be tenants if we assume the economy is going to grow based on the plans in the ETP.
It's a risk I admit but the risk is higher if we do nothing as a country. We are part of the Government's machinery in pushing the country to move forward.
Is there money coming from the Government to develop TRX?
The land was sold to us for RM230mil the valuation at that point of time.
They didn't write me a cheque for TRX
The rules on incentives often change to attract FDIs, why?
I cannot speak for the Government but I can roughly outline you the process. We, as the land owner and master developer, would want everything but it's not like whatever 1MDB wants, we get for TRX. There is a process to follow. There are a lot of discussions with the Securities Commission, Finance Ministry and Bank Negara, and it is up to the policy-makers to balance it up.
What's in store for investors in TRX?
There are different models we are examining, and the standard model is that I have the land, you have money and expertise, so we do a joint-venture, where you go and build and in return, I get some of what is built or I get money and you keep everything.
We are still firming up things.
It's not rocket science, just a matter of risk appetite.
What if you partner does not deliver?
That is why the choice of partners is very important.
Our partners are people who are suppose to have deep pockets. They also need to have the capability and commitment to the vision and the key point here is that, which ever the party we are working with, needs to be right, and we do not go through intermediaries.
Is businessman Low Taek Jho part of this project? Is he the one that helped get the commitment for the first RM3.5bil?
The role of Jho Low as far as 1MDB is concerned is zero. I 've heard talks that he is advising the Government on Middle Eastern investors but it's not true. What he does is to help promote Malaysia to investors.
Are we paying Jho Low anything?
Nope. His role is zero, if anything he is probably just introducing a few people to the Government there. We are dealing directly with the Government agencies there. There's no intermediary.
Who else has indicated interest beside the strategic investor?
The Japanese are definitely interested. Once the momentum is built, hopefully we can have our pick and be in a position to open up an international tender.
Have you opened up bids for construction players and companies to take part in TRX?
Not yet. We want to lock in the strategic investors first because when you are a strategic investor, you also want to have a say in who will participate in the project. We expect to have a lot of value around the table.
The idea is that we are definitely going to be encouraging local investors and developers, but we will balance that with the fact that we need to get FDIs and create something which is globally competitive.
We will let the market drive this.
The talk is that a large part of the development will be undertaken by investors from the Middle East.
No, we are looking beyond the Middle East. Enquiries are coming from all over the world from investors, potential tenants, technology and service providers.
By The Star
SBW: Why the name TRX from KLIFD?
Over the years, we got feedback that KLIFD is bit of a mouthful to pronounce and hard to remember, so we thought it'll be good to go and find a good memorable name for the district. TRX came about because it's on Jalan Tun Razak and we are just taking the cue from Wall Street, which is named after an actual street.
What's the role of the Government in TRX and why must the Government be driving it?
Because the Government is driving the ETP and who else is better to catalyse this than the Government?
The Government is going to start the ball rolling by doing up the master plan and setting standards. The developers will be invited to participate.
What if there are no “A” grade tenants for TRX?
There will be tenants if we assume the economy is going to grow based on the plans in the ETP.
It's a risk I admit but the risk is higher if we do nothing as a country. We are part of the Government's machinery in pushing the country to move forward.
Is there money coming from the Government to develop TRX?
The land was sold to us for RM230mil the valuation at that point of time.
They didn't write me a cheque for TRX
The rules on incentives often change to attract FDIs, why?
I cannot speak for the Government but I can roughly outline you the process. We, as the land owner and master developer, would want everything but it's not like whatever 1MDB wants, we get for TRX. There is a process to follow. There are a lot of discussions with the Securities Commission, Finance Ministry and Bank Negara, and it is up to the policy-makers to balance it up.
What's in store for investors in TRX?
There are different models we are examining, and the standard model is that I have the land, you have money and expertise, so we do a joint-venture, where you go and build and in return, I get some of what is built or I get money and you keep everything.
We are still firming up things.
It's not rocket science, just a matter of risk appetite.
What if you partner does not deliver?
That is why the choice of partners is very important.
Our partners are people who are suppose to have deep pockets. They also need to have the capability and commitment to the vision and the key point here is that, which ever the party we are working with, needs to be right, and we do not go through intermediaries.
Is businessman Low Taek Jho part of this project? Is he the one that helped get the commitment for the first RM3.5bil?
The role of Jho Low as far as 1MDB is concerned is zero. I 've heard talks that he is advising the Government on Middle Eastern investors but it's not true. What he does is to help promote Malaysia to investors.
Are we paying Jho Low anything?
Nope. His role is zero, if anything he is probably just introducing a few people to the Government there. We are dealing directly with the Government agencies there. There's no intermediary.
Who else has indicated interest beside the strategic investor?
The Japanese are definitely interested. Once the momentum is built, hopefully we can have our pick and be in a position to open up an international tender.
Have you opened up bids for construction players and companies to take part in TRX?
Not yet. We want to lock in the strategic investors first because when you are a strategic investor, you also want to have a say in who will participate in the project. We expect to have a lot of value around the table.
The idea is that we are definitely going to be encouraging local investors and developers, but we will balance that with the fact that we need to get FDIs and create something which is globally competitive.
We will let the market drive this.
The talk is that a large part of the development will be undertaken by investors from the Middle East.
No, we are looking beyond the Middle East. Enquiries are coming from all over the world from investors, potential tenants, technology and service providers.
By The Star
Labels:
Property Market
TRX envisioned to be a district where ‘talent congregates and value is created’
IMAGINE heading towards a building in the city centre and already knowing exactly where the empty parking spaces are after merely punching some buttons on your smartphone.
Then when you leave, even during peak hours, imagine yourself cruising back home, sidestepping the infamous traffic jams Kuala Lumpur is inundated with, thanks to numerous exit points.
While it may seem like small comfort to some, urbanites will tell you how welcoming this development is.
And it is but a teeny-weeny part of what the Tun Razak Exchange (TRX) aims to offer.
1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) chief executive officer Datuk Shahrol Halmi points out that such technology along with features such as on-site sewerage treatment plants, an air-conditioned pedestrian network and district-scale energy efficient features within the RM26bil strategic real estate development project, is set to create a benchmark for other financial districts in Kuala Lumpur.
A wide range of international restaurants, cafes, cultural and business activities, amenities and a beautiful huge park for families to enjoy complete with the best of security aim to enhance the entire experience for even the most sophisticated individual, the head honcho of 1MDB, the master developer of TRX, says.
And, the community within TRX is set to be made up of numerous nationalities.
While detractors will argue that all this sounds too good to be true and in some way the utopian picture is, Shahrol makes a point.
“We think we have to start somewhere, the risks are all there, but it is better than doing nothing,” he tells StarBizWeek in an interview.
At the risk of sounding like a commercial, he says, TRX is envisioned to be a district where “talent congregates and value is created”.
TRX which will sit on 70 acres in Jalan Tun Razak, according to preliminary plans, will comprise office buildings (48%), residence (31%), retail (10%), hospitality (10%) and institutional (1%).
A total of 26 buildings, to have green certification, are expected to sit on the site.
“The message here is that we are not limiting ourselves to financial services.
“We are open and receptive even to support services lawyers, accountants, anybody and everybody who can basically contribute to the vibrancy and diversity of the district,” he says.
The first phase of TRX comprising a mall, apartments and a hotel, is slated to open in 2016 to coincide with the completion of the first line of the country's mass rapid transit (MRT) system.
There will be four phases in total.
Thus far, there has been much interest shown in TRX from investors and companies, according to Shahrol but 1MDB is awaiting discussions with strategic investors to be completed before opening up bids for projects in the district.
Overseas models
The 1MDB team made visits to many countries before deciding to come up with a district that is “uniquely Malaysian.”
Visits were made to famous districts globally with large expatriate communities including to Roppongi, a district in Tokyo, London's Canary Wharf, Singapore's Marina Bay Financial Centre and various financial districts in Hong Kong.
“We incorporated only the best of these places because not all of their features are applicable here,” Shahrol says.
“For example, when I talk about families enjoying themselves in the park, that's not so suitable in our weather.
“But I told the team, we must make it happen, I was surprised to find out there is actually technology which enables rain-trees to be planted on top of our multi-level podiums... so when you are walking on top, the big trees in the park can shield you from the heat,” he says.
The buildings are also expected to incorporate wind-tunnel effects, so a simple breeze will be amplified for a cooling effect, Shahrol adds.
In Malaysia, TRX's closest comparisons would probably be the financial areas of Jalan Sultan Ismail and Jalan Raja Chulan, says Shahrol but he stresses that 1MDB is not planning to pinch companies which are already located at these locations and get them to re-locate to TRX.
“It's more of who are the new players that we can entice those who would have otherwise set up their regional centres in Hong Kong or Singapore.
“Over time, the aspiration is that there's going to be a flight of quality where by then it would make so much business sense for companies to move to TRX because of all the business there.
“That will force the rest of KL to upgrade their services... remember this is a long-term plan,” he says.
By The Star
Then when you leave, even during peak hours, imagine yourself cruising back home, sidestepping the infamous traffic jams Kuala Lumpur is inundated with, thanks to numerous exit points.
While it may seem like small comfort to some, urbanites will tell you how welcoming this development is.
And it is but a teeny-weeny part of what the Tun Razak Exchange (TRX) aims to offer.
1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) chief executive officer Datuk Shahrol Halmi points out that such technology along with features such as on-site sewerage treatment plants, an air-conditioned pedestrian network and district-scale energy efficient features within the RM26bil strategic real estate development project, is set to create a benchmark for other financial districts in Kuala Lumpur.
A wide range of international restaurants, cafes, cultural and business activities, amenities and a beautiful huge park for families to enjoy complete with the best of security aim to enhance the entire experience for even the most sophisticated individual, the head honcho of 1MDB, the master developer of TRX, says.
And, the community within TRX is set to be made up of numerous nationalities.
While detractors will argue that all this sounds too good to be true and in some way the utopian picture is, Shahrol makes a point.
“We think we have to start somewhere, the risks are all there, but it is better than doing nothing,” he tells StarBizWeek in an interview.
At the risk of sounding like a commercial, he says, TRX is envisioned to be a district where “talent congregates and value is created”.
TRX which will sit on 70 acres in Jalan Tun Razak, according to preliminary plans, will comprise office buildings (48%), residence (31%), retail (10%), hospitality (10%) and institutional (1%).
A total of 26 buildings, to have green certification, are expected to sit on the site.
“The message here is that we are not limiting ourselves to financial services.
“We are open and receptive even to support services lawyers, accountants, anybody and everybody who can basically contribute to the vibrancy and diversity of the district,” he says.
The first phase of TRX comprising a mall, apartments and a hotel, is slated to open in 2016 to coincide with the completion of the first line of the country's mass rapid transit (MRT) system.
There will be four phases in total.
Thus far, there has been much interest shown in TRX from investors and companies, according to Shahrol but 1MDB is awaiting discussions with strategic investors to be completed before opening up bids for projects in the district.
Overseas models
The 1MDB team made visits to many countries before deciding to come up with a district that is “uniquely Malaysian.”
Visits were made to famous districts globally with large expatriate communities including to Roppongi, a district in Tokyo, London's Canary Wharf, Singapore's Marina Bay Financial Centre and various financial districts in Hong Kong.
“We incorporated only the best of these places because not all of their features are applicable here,” Shahrol says.
“For example, when I talk about families enjoying themselves in the park, that's not so suitable in our weather.
“But I told the team, we must make it happen, I was surprised to find out there is actually technology which enables rain-trees to be planted on top of our multi-level podiums... so when you are walking on top, the big trees in the park can shield you from the heat,” he says.
The buildings are also expected to incorporate wind-tunnel effects, so a simple breeze will be amplified for a cooling effect, Shahrol adds.
In Malaysia, TRX's closest comparisons would probably be the financial areas of Jalan Sultan Ismail and Jalan Raja Chulan, says Shahrol but he stresses that 1MDB is not planning to pinch companies which are already located at these locations and get them to re-locate to TRX.
“It's more of who are the new players that we can entice those who would have otherwise set up their regional centres in Hong Kong or Singapore.
“Over time, the aspiration is that there's going to be a flight of quality where by then it would make so much business sense for companies to move to TRX because of all the business there.
“That will force the rest of KL to upgrade their services... remember this is a long-term plan,” he says.
By The Star
Labels:
Property Market
Developing RRI land
EPF’s wholly-owned unit Kwasa Land now owns the RRI land in Sungei Buloh.
As a person who was born and spent his childhood years in the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia (RRI), Sungei Buloh, it is with some nostalgia that I read about plans to develop the area.
That piece of land now straddling a bustling area near Kota Damansara, Subang Airport and the rapidly developing area of Subang, houses the RRI's research facilities and rubber estates.
For those who lived there a long time ago, it was a tranquil and idyllic area with swimming and paddling in the streams, sports of all sorts in the evenings, hunting, biking and excursions into the jungle nearby. Tigers were said to have been sighted and someone even shot a leopard once.
But the area around it is virtually unrecognisable now and the RRI land stands like an oasis in a desert of poorly planned development. But it will fall to development too as the land has been sold, reported for RM2bil to the Employees Provident Fund (EPF). RRI will get to retain 216ha for its research facilities.
EPF's wholly-owned subsidiary Kwasa Land Sdn Bhd will undertake a master plan of the entire area, the area for development will be split up into smaller parcels and the private sector will be invited to tender for their development.
There are plans to have an MRT station too in the area and the whole development is expected to take 10 to 15 years.
No doubt, EPF was chosen by the Government to get the RRI land because it is a provident fund whose members comprise most of the workers in the country and it would therefore be seen as a more neutral and independent party to develop the land.
It is necessary that it gets expertise to both produce the master plan as well as to see how it can maximise the value of the land for itself.
Land scarcity in the Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley area means the people will be closely watching the former RRI land, possibly among the largest available so close to KL city, to see who gets what.
In fact the jostling seems to have already started. It was reported that listed Dijaya Corp was in talks with top officials of EPF on developing some parcels there. This was promptly denied by Kwasa Land.
Dijaya has declined comment but continued to express its interest in developing some parcels of the land, dangling as a carrot an access road which can be built on its own land that it says will link the RRI land to Petaling Jaya.
In future, more are likely to stake their claims and make their cases for why they should be chosen over others.
EPF and Kwasa should come up with a master plan. This is not something that can be done in a month or two and even if it is finalised there should be provisions to accommodate changes in future demand.
That requires technical expertise. What can be done is to have an international tender process to invite property players to come up with the best master plan and choose one. It will mean input from some of the best brains in the world in the area would have been tapped.
Next would be to get the best local construction companies involved not necessarily developers. They can then build the projects according to the exact specifications set by EPF and EPF will have complete control of the development at all times.
Completion schedules need not be left to the mercy of developers who might finish their projects at different times. Importantly, it also means that EPF would be able to maximise the returns from the development of the land instead of sharing it with other developers.
If whole parcels of land are sold to other developers, then it is highly likely that the entire project will not be properly integrated and there will be a mishmash of different looking structures with no continuity or theme through out the entire development.
On the flip side, that would mean that EPF would have to take on plenty of close management, tough but not impossible with the right staff and the right consultants.
But above all what is needed is honesty, competence, integrity and transparency in all the efforts to do something good with this massive piece of land. That means instituting the right processes from the start open tenders, picking the best to do the job, etc.
EPF through Kwasa must maximise the use of this land it must come up with an overall master plan which combines all elements of a good development, execute well to give a project that satisfies customers while at the same time bringing it good returns.
P Gunasegaram (t.p.guna@gmail.com) plans to visit the RRI land again before it is forever changed.
By The Star
As a person who was born and spent his childhood years in the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia (RRI), Sungei Buloh, it is with some nostalgia that I read about plans to develop the area.
That piece of land now straddling a bustling area near Kota Damansara, Subang Airport and the rapidly developing area of Subang, houses the RRI's research facilities and rubber estates.
For those who lived there a long time ago, it was a tranquil and idyllic area with swimming and paddling in the streams, sports of all sorts in the evenings, hunting, biking and excursions into the jungle nearby. Tigers were said to have been sighted and someone even shot a leopard once.
But the area around it is virtually unrecognisable now and the RRI land stands like an oasis in a desert of poorly planned development. But it will fall to development too as the land has been sold, reported for RM2bil to the Employees Provident Fund (EPF). RRI will get to retain 216ha for its research facilities.
EPF's wholly-owned subsidiary Kwasa Land Sdn Bhd will undertake a master plan of the entire area, the area for development will be split up into smaller parcels and the private sector will be invited to tender for their development.
There are plans to have an MRT station too in the area and the whole development is expected to take 10 to 15 years.
No doubt, EPF was chosen by the Government to get the RRI land because it is a provident fund whose members comprise most of the workers in the country and it would therefore be seen as a more neutral and independent party to develop the land.
It is necessary that it gets expertise to both produce the master plan as well as to see how it can maximise the value of the land for itself.
Land scarcity in the Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley area means the people will be closely watching the former RRI land, possibly among the largest available so close to KL city, to see who gets what.
In fact the jostling seems to have already started. It was reported that listed Dijaya Corp was in talks with top officials of EPF on developing some parcels there. This was promptly denied by Kwasa Land.
Dijaya has declined comment but continued to express its interest in developing some parcels of the land, dangling as a carrot an access road which can be built on its own land that it says will link the RRI land to Petaling Jaya.
In future, more are likely to stake their claims and make their cases for why they should be chosen over others.
EPF and Kwasa should come up with a master plan. This is not something that can be done in a month or two and even if it is finalised there should be provisions to accommodate changes in future demand.
That requires technical expertise. What can be done is to have an international tender process to invite property players to come up with the best master plan and choose one. It will mean input from some of the best brains in the world in the area would have been tapped.
Next would be to get the best local construction companies involved not necessarily developers. They can then build the projects according to the exact specifications set by EPF and EPF will have complete control of the development at all times.
Completion schedules need not be left to the mercy of developers who might finish their projects at different times. Importantly, it also means that EPF would be able to maximise the returns from the development of the land instead of sharing it with other developers.
If whole parcels of land are sold to other developers, then it is highly likely that the entire project will not be properly integrated and there will be a mishmash of different looking structures with no continuity or theme through out the entire development.
On the flip side, that would mean that EPF would have to take on plenty of close management, tough but not impossible with the right staff and the right consultants.
But above all what is needed is honesty, competence, integrity and transparency in all the efforts to do something good with this massive piece of land. That means instituting the right processes from the start open tenders, picking the best to do the job, etc.
EPF through Kwasa must maximise the use of this land it must come up with an overall master plan which combines all elements of a good development, execute well to give a project that satisfies customers while at the same time bringing it good returns.
P Gunasegaram (t.p.guna@gmail.com) plans to visit the RRI land again before it is forever changed.
By The Star
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












